EFNS 指南:神经病病理性疼痛的药物治疗:2010 年修订版。

EFNS guidelines on the pharmacological treatment of neuropathic pain: 2010 revision.

机构信息

EFNS Panel Neuropathic Pain.

INSERM U987, Centre d'Evaluation et de Traitement de la Douleur, Hôpital Ambroise Paré, APHP, Boulogne-Billancourt, and Université Versailles-Saint-Quentin,Versailles, France.

出版信息

Eur J Neurol. 2010 Sep;17(9):1113-e88. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2010.02999.x. Epub 2010 Apr 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

This second European Federation of Neurological Societies Task Force aimed at updating the existing evidence about the pharmacological treatment of neuropathic pain since 2005.

METHODS

Studies were identified using the Cochrane Database and Medline. Trials were classified according to the aetiological condition. All class I and II randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were assessed; lower class studies were considered only in conditions that had no top-level studies. Treatments administered using repeated or single administrations were considered, provided they are feasible in an outpatient setting.

RESULTS

Most large RCTs included patients with diabetic polyneuropathies and post-herpetic neuralgia, while an increasing number of smaller studies explored other conditions. Drugs generally have similar efficacy in various conditions, except in trigeminal neuralgia, chronic radiculopathy and HIV neuropathy, with level A evidence in support of tricyclic antidepressants (TCA), pregabalin, gabapentin, tramadol and opioids (in various conditions), duloxetine, venlafaxine, topical lidocaine and capsaicin patches (in restricted conditions). Combination therapy appears useful for TCA-gabapentin and gabapentin-opioids (level A).

CONCLUSIONS

There are still too few large-scale comparative studies. For future trials, we recommend to assess comorbidities, quality of life, symptoms and signs with standardized tools and attempt to better define responder profiles to specific drug treatments.

摘要

背景和目的

本欧洲神经病学会联合会第二次专题工作组旨在更新 2005 年以来有关治疗神经性疼痛的药物治疗的现有证据。

方法

使用 Cochrane 数据库和 Medline 确定研究。根据病因条件对试验进行分类。评估所有 I 类和 II 类随机对照试验(RCT);仅在无高级别研究的情况下,才考虑较低级别的研究。考虑了重复或单次给药的治疗方法,前提是它们在门诊环境中是可行的。

结果

大多数大型 RCT 纳入了糖尿病多发性神经病和带状疱疹后神经痛患者,而越来越多的较小研究则探索了其他疾病。除了三叉神经痛、慢性神经根病和 HIV 神经病外,药物在各种疾病中的疗效大致相似,A级证据支持三环类抗抑郁药(TCA)、普瑞巴林、加巴喷丁、曲马多和阿片类药物(各种疾病)、度洛西汀、文拉法辛、局部利多卡因和辣椒素贴剂(在有限的情况下)。联合治疗对 TCA-加巴喷丁和加巴喷丁-阿片类药物(A级)可能有用。

结论

仍缺乏大规模的比较研究。对于未来的试验,我们建议使用标准化工具评估合并症、生活质量、症状和体征,并尝试更好地定义对特定药物治疗的反应者特征。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索