Currie P, Saltissi S
Department of Cardiology, Royal Liverpool Hospital, UK.
Eur Heart J. 1991 Mar;12(3):395-400. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a059907.
To study the implications of transient myocardial ischaemia following acute myocardial infarction we compared ambulatory ST segment monitoring with exercise treadmill testing in 170 patients (mean age 58 years) at 4-8 weeks after admission. Ambulatory monitoring detected transient ischaemia (265 episodes; 249 (94%) silent) in 53/170 patients (31%) which was less frequent than ischaemia during exercise testing (90 patients; 53%) (P less than 0.0001). However, patients displaying transient ambulatory ischaemia (i) achieved less total exercise (248.7 +/- 17.2 vs 318.7 +/- 14.1 s; means +/- SEM) (P less than 0.006), (ii) developed exercise ST deviation earlier (172.4 +/- 14.3 vs 244.8 +/- 16.2 s) (P less than 0.0004) and (iii) had more widespread exercise ischaemia (3.8 +/- 0.3 vs 2.5 +/- 0.2 ECG leads) (P less than 0.005). Positive ambulatory ST segment monitoring was infrequently found (12/80 patients; 15%) in the presence of a negative exercise test but did identify the majority of patients (9/11 patients; 82%) with easily provoked exercise ischaemia and hence strongly positive exercise tests. These data suggest a limited role for routine 24 h ambulatory monitoring after myocardial infarction for the diagnosis of ongoing ischaemia but raise the possibility of an important place for this test in prognosis and risk stratification.