• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

支架时代行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者束支传导阻滞的预后意义。

Prognostic implications of bundle branch block in patients undergoing primary coronary angioplasty in the stent era.

机构信息

Cardiovascular Institute, San Carlos University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2010 May 1;105(9):1276-83. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.12.044. Epub 2010 Mar 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.12.044
PMID:20403479
Abstract

The presence of bundle branch block (BBB) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction has been associated with a poor outcome. However, the implications of BBB in patients undergoing primary angioplasty in the stent era are poorly established. Furthermore, the prognostic implications of BBB type (right vs left and previous vs transient or persistent) remain unknown. We analyzed the data from 913 consecutive patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty. All clinical, electrocardiographic, and angiographic data were prospectively collected. The median follow-up period was 19 months. The primary end point was the combined outcome of death and reinfarction. BBB was documented in 140 patients (15%). Right BBB (RBBB) was present in 119 patients (13%) and was previous in 27 (23%), persistent in 45 (38%), and transient in 47 (39%). Left BBB (LBBB) was present in 21 patients (2%) and was previous in 8 (38%), persistent in 9 (43%), and transient in 4 (19%). Patients with BBB were older, and more frequently had diabetes, anterior infarctions, a greater Killip class, a lower left ventricular ejection fraction, and greater mortality (all p <0.005) than patients without BBB. The short- and long-term primary outcome occurred more frequently in patients with persistent RBBB/LBBB than in those with previous or transient RBBB/LBBB. On multivariate analysis, persistent RBBB/LBBB emerged as an independent predictor of death and reinfarction. In conclusion, in patients undergoing primary angioplasty in the stent era, BBB is associated with poor short- and long-term prognosis. This risk appears to be particularly high among patients with persistent BBB.

摘要

束支传导阻滞(BBB)在 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中的存在与预后不良有关。然而,在支架时代接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的患者中,BBB 的意义尚未明确。此外,BBB 类型(右束支阻滞与左束支阻滞,以及陈旧性与一过性或持续性)对预后的影响仍不清楚。我们分析了 913 例接受直接 PCI 治疗的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的资料。所有临床、心电图和血管造影数据均前瞻性收集。中位随访时间为 19 个月。主要终点是死亡和再梗死的联合终点。140 例患者(15%)存在 BBB。119 例患者(13%)存在右束支阻滞(RBBB),其中陈旧性 27 例(23%),持续性 45 例(38%),一过性 47 例(39%)。21 例患者(2%)存在左束支阻滞(LBBB),其中陈旧性 8 例(38%),持续性 9 例(43%),一过性 4 例(19%)。存在 BBB 的患者年龄较大,更常患有糖尿病、前壁梗死、较高的 Killip 分级、较低的左心室射血分数和更高的死亡率(所有 p<0.005)。与无 BBB 的患者相比,持续性 RBBB/LBBB 的患者更易发生短期和长期的主要结局。多变量分析显示,持续性 RBBB/LBBB 是死亡和再梗死的独立预测因素。总之,在支架时代接受直接 PCI 的患者中,BBB 与短期和长期预后不良相关。这种风险在持续性 BBB 患者中似乎特别高。

相似文献

1
Prognostic implications of bundle branch block in patients undergoing primary coronary angioplasty in the stent era.支架时代行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者束支传导阻滞的预后意义。
Am J Cardiol. 2010 May 1;105(9):1276-83. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.12.044. Epub 2010 Mar 11.
2
Comparison of the prognostic effect of left versus right versus no bundle branch block on presenting electrocardiogram in acute myocardial infarction patients treated with primary angioplasty in the primary angioplasty in myocardial infarction trials.在心肌梗死直接血管成形术试验中,接受直接血管成形术治疗的急性心肌梗死患者,比较左束支传导阻滞、右束支传导阻滞与无束支传导阻滞对初始心电图的预后影响。
Am J Cardiol. 2005 Aug 15;96(4):482-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.04.006.
3
Prognostic differences between different types of bundle branch block during the early phase of acute myocardial infarction: insights from the Hirulog and Early Reperfusion or Occlusion (HERO)-2 trial.急性心肌梗死早期不同类型束支传导阻滞的预后差异:来自希鲁单抗与早期再灌注或闭塞(HERO)-2试验的见解
Eur Heart J. 2006 Jan;27(1):21-8. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi622. Epub 2005 Nov 3.
4
Incidence and clinical impact of right bundle branch block in patients with acute myocardial infarction: ST elevation myocardial infarction versus non-ST elevation myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死患者右束支传导阻滞的发生率及临床影响:ST段抬高型心肌梗死与非ST段抬高型心肌梗死的比较
Am Heart J. 2008 Aug;156(2):256-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.03.003. Epub 2008 Jun 20.
5
Prognosis of different types of atrial fibrillation in the primary angioplasty era.在直接经皮冠状动脉腔内血管成形术时代不同类型心房颤动的预后
Coron Artery Dis. 2012 Dec;23(8):511-6. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0b013e328358a5d2.
6
Impact of admission creatinine level on clinical outcomes of patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent implantation.入院时肌酐水平对接受药物洗脱支架植入的直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者临床结局的影响。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2008 Dec 5;121(23):2379-83.
7
Right and left bundle branch block as predictors of long-term mortality following myocardial infarction.右束支和左束支阻滞作为心肌梗死后长期死亡率的预测因子。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2011 Dec;13(12):1349-54. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfr130. Epub 2011 Oct 25.
8
Relation of bundle branch block to long-term (four-year) mortality in hospitalized patients with systolic heart failure.束支传导阻滞与收缩性心力衰竭住院患者长期(四年)死亡率的关系。
Am J Cardiol. 2011 Feb 15;107(4):540-4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.10.007. Epub 2010 Dec 22.
9
Right bundle-branch block in anterior acute myocardial infarction in the coronary intervention era: acute angiographic findings and prognosis.冠状动脉介入治疗时代前壁急性心肌梗死合并右束支传导阻滞:急性血管造影结果及预后
Int J Cardiol. 2007 Mar 2;116(1):57-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2006.02.010. Epub 2006 Jul 3.
10
Relation of New Permanent Right or Left Bundle Branch Block on Short- and Long-Term Mortality in Acute Myocardial Infarction Bundle Branch Block and Myocardial Infarction.急性心肌梗死中新增永久性右束支或左束支传导阻滞与短期及长期死亡率的关系 束支传导阻滞与心肌梗死
Am J Cardiol. 2015 Oct 1;116(7):1003-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.07.019. Epub 2015 Jul 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Microcirculatory dysfunction in patients with acute anterior myocardial infarction combined with new complete right bundle branch block.急性前壁心肌梗死合并新发完全性右束支传导阻滞患者的微循环功能障碍
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025 May 29;25(1):414. doi: 10.1186/s12872-025-04872-9.
2
Clinical Predictors of Heart Failure after STEMI: Data from a Middle-Income Country with Limited Access to Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.ST段抬高型心肌梗死后心力衰竭的临床预测因素:来自一个经皮冠状动脉介入治疗机会有限的中等收入国家的数据。
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2025 Mar;122(3):e20240447. doi: 10.36660/abc.20240447.
3
Extreme Risk of Sudden Cardiac Death within Three Months after Revascularization in Patients with Ischemic Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction.
缺血性左心室收缩功能障碍患者血管重建术后三个月内心脏性猝死的极高风险
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Oct 18;24(10):294. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2410294. eCollection 2023 Oct.
4
Prognostic impact of right bundle branch block in hospitalized patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy: a single-center cohort study.特发性扩张型心肌病住院患者右束支传导阻滞的预后影响:一项单中心队列研究
J Int Med Res. 2020 Jan;48(1):300060518801478. doi: 10.1177/0300060518801478. Epub 2018 Oct 14.
5
Prognostic value of new-onset right bundle-branch block in acute myocardial infarction patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.急性心肌梗死患者新发右束支传导阻滞的预后价值:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
PeerJ. 2018 Mar 12;6:e4497. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4497. eCollection 2018.
6
Prognostic Significance of Right Bundle Branch Block for Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.右束支传导阻滞对急性心肌梗死患者的预后意义:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Med Sci Monit. 2016 Mar 27;22:998-1004. doi: 10.12659/msm.895687.
7
Significance of an isolated new right bundle branch block in a patient with chest pain.胸痛患者孤立性新发右束支传导阻滞的意义。
BMJ Case Rep. 2015 Jun 8;2015:bcr2015209435. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2015-209435.
8
What we have learned from the ESC position paper on arrhythmias in acute coronary syndromes.我们从欧洲心脏病学会关于急性冠状动脉综合征心律失常的立场文件中学到了什么。
Anatol J Cardiol. 2015 Feb;15(2):94-6. doi: 10.5152/akd.2015.6206.
9
ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in women with type 2 diabetes.2型糖尿病女性患者的ST段抬高型心肌梗死
Diabetes Care. 2013 Nov;36(11):3469-75. doi: 10.2337/dc13-0394. Epub 2013 Oct 2.