Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Neurosurgery. 2010 May;66(5):1005-12. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000367721.73220.C9.
Gross total resection of intradural spinal tumors can be achieved in the majority of cases with preservation of long-term neurological function. However, postoperative progressive spinal deformity complicates outcome in a subset of patients after surgery. We set out to determine whether the use of laminoplasty (LP) vs laminectomy (LM) has reduced the incidence of subsequent spinal deformity following intradural tumor resection at our institution.
We retrospectively reviewed the records of 238 consecutive patients undergoing resection of intradural tumor at a single institution. The incidence of subsequent progressive kyphosis or scoliosis, perioperative morbidity, and neurological outcome were compared between the LP and LM cohorts.
One hundred eighty patients underwent LM and 58 underwent LP. Patients were 46 +/- 19 years old with median modified McCormick score of 2. Tumors were intramedullary in 102 (43%) and extramedullary in 102 (43%). All baseline clinical, radiographic, and operative variables were similar between the LP and LM cohorts. LP was associated with a decreased mean length of hospitalization (5 vs 7 days; P = .002) and trend of decreased incisional cerebrospinal fluid leak (3% vs 9%; P = .14). Following LP vs LM, 5 (9%) vs 21 (12%) patients developed progressive deformity (P = .728) a mean of 14 months after surgery. The incidence of progressive deformity was also similar between LP vs LM in pediatric patients < 18 years of age (43% vs 36%), with preoperative scoliosis or loss of cervical/lumbar lordosis (28% vs 22%), or with intramedullary tumors (11% vs 11%).
LP for the resection of intradural spinal tumors was not associated with a decreased incidence of short-term progressive spinal deformity or improved neurological function. However, LP may be associated with a reduction in incisional cerebrospinal fluid leak. Longer-term follow-up is warranted to definitively assess the long-term effect of LP and the risk of deformity over time.
在大多数情况下,通过全切除硬脊膜内脊髓肿瘤,可以保留长期的神经功能。然而,手术后的进行性脊柱畸形会使一部分患者的手术结果复杂化。我们旨在确定在我们机构中,使用椎板成形术(LP)与椎板切除术(LM)是否可以降低硬脊膜内肿瘤切除术后随后发生脊柱畸形的发生率。
我们回顾性分析了在一家机构接受硬脊膜内肿瘤切除的 238 例连续患者的记录。比较 LP 和 LM 两组患者的后续进展性后凸或侧凸、围手术期发病率和神经功能结局。
180 例患者行 LM,58 例行 LP。患者年龄为 46±19 岁,改良 McCormick 评分中位数为 2 分。肿瘤位于髓内 102 例(43%),髓外 102 例(43%)。LP 和 LM 两组患者的所有基线临床、影像学和手术变量均相似。LP 与平均住院时间缩短相关(5 天 vs 7 天;P=0.002),切口脑脊液漏的发生率降低趋势(3% vs 9%;P=0.14)。LP 后 5 例(9%)患者发生进展性畸形,LM 后 21 例(12%)患者发生进展性畸形(P=0.728),术后平均 14 个月。LP 与 LM 两组在<18 岁的儿童患者中进展性畸形的发生率相似(43% vs 36%),术前存在侧凸或颈椎/腰椎前凸丢失(28% vs 22%)或髓内肿瘤(11% vs 11%)。
LP 用于切除硬脊膜内脊髓肿瘤不会降低短期进行性脊柱畸形或改善神经功能的发生率。然而,LP 可能与切口脑脊液漏的减少有关。需要进行更长时间的随访,以明确评估 LP 的长期效果和随时间推移发生畸形的风险。