Suppr超能文献

“这让我见识到了他所具备的技能”:药剂师和导师对药剂师补充处方权的看法。

'It's showed me the skills that he has': pharmacists' and mentors' views on pharmacist supplementary prescribing.

作者信息

Lloyd Fran, Parsons Carole, Hughes Carmel M

机构信息

Northern Ireland Centre for Pharmacy Learning and Development School of Pharmacy, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK.

出版信息

Int J Pharm Pract. 2010 Feb;18(1):29-36. doi: 10.1211/ijpp.18.01.0006.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Supplementary prescribing has seen pharmacists assume greater responsibility for prescribing in collaboration with doctors. This study explored the context and experiences, in relation to the practice of supplementary prescribing, of pharmacists and physicians (who acted as their training mentors) at least 12 months after pharmacists had qualified as supplementary prescribers.

METHODS

The setting was primary and secondary healthcare sectors in Northern Ireland. Pharmacists and mentors who had participated in a pre-training study were invited to take part. All pharmacists (n = 47) were invited to participate in focus groups, while mentors (n = 35) were asked to participate in face-to-face semi-structured interviews. The research took place between May 2005 and September 2007. All discussions and interviews were audiotaped, transcribed and analysed using constant comparison.

KEY FINDINGS

Nine pharmacist focus groups were convened (number per group ranging from three to six; total n = 40) and 31 semi-structured interviews with mentors were conducted. The six main themes that emerged were optimal practice setting, professional progression for prescribing pharmacists, outcomes for prescribing pharmacists, mentors and patients, relationships, barriers to implementation and the future of pharmacist prescribing. Where practised, pharmacist prescribing had been accepted, worked best for chronic disease management, was perceived to have reduced doctors' workload and improved continuity of care for patients. However, three-quarters of pharmacists qualified to practise as supplementary prescribers were not actively prescribing, largely due to logistical and organisational barriers rather than inter-professional tensions. Independent prescribing was seen as contentious by mentors, particularly because of the diagnostic element.

CONCLUSIONS

Supplementary prescribing has been successful where it has been implemented but a number of barriers remain which are preventing the wider acceptance of this practice innovation.

摘要

目的

辅助开方使药剂师在与医生合作开方时承担了更大责任。本研究探讨了药剂师和医生(担任其培训导师)在药剂师获得辅助开方资格至少12个月后,与辅助开方实践相关的背景和经验。

方法

研究背景为北爱尔兰的初级和二级医疗保健部门。邀请了参与过培训前研究的药剂师和导师参与。邀请所有药剂师(n = 47)参加焦点小组,而导师(n = 35)则被要求参加面对面的半结构化访谈。研究于2005年5月至2007年9月进行。所有讨论和访谈均进行录音、转录,并采用持续比较法进行分析。

主要发现

召开了9个药剂师焦点小组(每组人数从3人到6人不等;共n = 40),并对导师进行了31次半结构化访谈。出现的六个主要主题是最佳实践环境、开方药剂师的职业发展、开方药剂师、导师和患者的结果、关系、实施障碍以及药剂师开方的未来。在实施药剂师开方的地方,这种做法已被接受,在慢性病管理方面效果最佳,被认为减轻了医生的工作量,并改善了患者护理的连续性。然而,四分之三有资格作为辅助开方者执业的药剂师并未积极开方,主要是由于后勤和组织障碍,而非专业间的紧张关系。导师们认为独立开方存在争议,特别是因为其中的诊断因素。

结论

辅助开方在实施的地方取得了成功,但仍存在一些障碍,阻碍了这种实践创新被更广泛地接受。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验