Bilić Ivica, Dzamonja Gordan, Lusić Ivo, Matijaca Meri, Caljkusić Kresimir
University Department of Neurology, Split University Hospital Center, Split, Croatia.
Acta Clin Croat. 2009 Sep;48(4):399-403.
The aim of the study was to justify the hypothesis that risk factors do not differ between ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke. This retrospective study included 1066 stroke patients. The prevalence of risk factors and hospital-based survival were compared between patients with ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke. Data were retrieved from patient records. Statistical analysis was done by use of chi2-test and t-test for dependent samples. The group of hemorrhagic stroke consisted of 70 (47.9%) female and 76 (52.1%) male patients. The group of ischemic stroke included 450 (48.9%) female and 470 (51.1%) male patients. Ischemic stroke patients had a higher prevalence of hypertension (79% vs. 72%), atherosclerotic diseases (50% vs. 34%) and atrial fibrillation (15.5% vs. 4.2%), and were statistically significantly older (72.5 +/-10.4 vs. 65.7 +/- 12.8) than those with hemorrhagic stroke, however, fatal outcome was more common in the latter (26% vs. 17%). In conclusion, data analysis pointed to differences between hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke according to both risk factors and stroke outcome.
本研究的目的是验证缺血性卒中和出血性卒中的危险因素无差异这一假设。这项回顾性研究纳入了1066例卒中患者。对缺血性卒中和出血性卒中患者的危险因素患病率及院内生存率进行了比较。数据从患者记录中获取。采用卡方检验和配对t检验进行统计分析。出血性卒中组包括70例(47.9%)女性和76例(52.1%)男性患者。缺血性卒中组包括450例(48.9%)女性和470例(51.1%)男性患者。缺血性卒中患者高血压(79%对72%)、动脉粥样硬化疾病(50%对34%)和心房颤动(15.5%对4.2%)的患病率更高,且在统计学上比出血性卒中患者年龄更大(72.5±10.4对65.7±12.8),然而,后者的致命结局更为常见(26%对17%)。总之,数据分析表明出血性卒中和缺血性卒中在危险因素和卒中结局方面均存在差异。