Screening and Test Evaluation Program, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
BMJ. 2010 Apr 20;340:c1594. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c1594.
To evaluate current processes by which young children presenting with a febrile illness but suspected of having serious bacterial infection are diagnosed and treated, and to develop and test a multivariable model to distinguish serious bacterial infections from self limiting non-bacterial illnesses. Design Two year prospective cohort study. Setting The emergency department of The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, Australia.
Children aged less than 5 years presenting with a febrile illness between 1 July 2004 and 30 June 2006.
A standardised clinical evaluation that included mandatory entry of 40 clinical features into the hospital's electronic record keeping system was performed by physicians. Serious bacterial infections were confirmed or excluded using standard radiological and microbiological tests and follow-up. Main outcome measures Diagnosis of one of three key types of serious bacterial infection (urinary tract infection, pneumonia, and bacteraemia), and the accuracy of both our clinical decision making model and clinician judgment in making these diagnoses.
We had follow-up data for 93% of the 15 781 instances of febrile illnesses recorded during the study period. The combined prevalence of any of the three infections of interest (urinary tract infection, pneumonia, or bacteraemia) was 7.2% (1120/15 781, 95% confidence interval (CI) 6.7% to 7.5%), with urinary tract infection the diagnosis in 543 (3.4%) cases of febrile illness (95% CI 3.2% to 3.7%), pneumonia in 533 (3.4%) cases (95% CI 3.1% to 3.7%), and bacteraemia in 64 (0.4%) cases (95% CI 0.3% to 0.5%). Almost all (>94%) of the children with serious bacterial infections had the appropriate test (urine culture, chest radiograph, or blood culture). Antibiotics were prescribed acutely in 66% (359/543) of children with urinary tract infection, 69% (366/533) with pneumonia, and 81% (52/64) with bacteraemia. However, 20% (2686/13 557) of children without bacterial infection were also prescribed antibiotics. On the basis of the data from the clinical evaluations and the confirmed diagnosis, a diagnostic model was developed using multinomial logistic regression methods. Physicians' diagnoses of bacterial infection had low sensitivity (10-50%) and high specificity (90-100%), whereas the clinical diagnostic model provided a broad range of values for sensitivity and specificity.
Emergency department physicians tend to underestimate the likelihood of serious bacterial infection in young children with fever, leading to undertreatment with antibiotics. A clinical diagnostic model could improve decision making by increasing sensitivity for detecting serious bacterial infection, thereby improving early treatment.
评估目前用于诊断和治疗因发热就诊但疑似严重细菌感染的幼儿的流程,并制定和检验一种多变量模型,以区分严重细菌感染和自限性非细菌性疾病。
前瞻性队列研究,研究时间为 2004 年 7 月 1 日至 2006 年 6 月 30 日。
澳大利亚韦斯特米德儿童医院的急诊科。
2004 年 7 月 1 日至 2006 年 6 月 30 日期间因发热就诊且年龄小于 5 岁的儿童。
由医生进行标准化临床评估,包括强制性输入 40 项临床特征到医院的电子病历系统。采用标准影像学和微生物学检查和随访来确定严重细菌感染的确诊或排除。
三种主要类型的严重细菌感染(尿路感染、肺炎和菌血症)的诊断,以及我们的临床决策模型和临床医生判断在这些诊断中的准确性。
我们对研究期间记录的 15781 例发热病例中的 93%进行了随访。三种感兴趣的感染(尿路感染、肺炎或菌血症)的合并患病率为 7.2%(1120/15781,95%置信区间[CI]为 6.7%至 7.5%),其中尿路感染的诊断为 543 例(3.4%)(95%CI为 3.2%至 3.7%),肺炎为 533 例(3.4%)(95%CI为 3.1%至 3.7%),菌血症为 64 例(0.4%)(95%CI为 0.3%至 0.5%)。几乎所有(>94%)严重细菌感染患儿都进行了适当的检查(尿培养、胸部 X 线检查或血培养)。尿路感染患儿中 66%(359/543)、肺炎患儿中 69%(366/533)和菌血症患儿中 81%(52/64)急性使用了抗生素。然而,20%(2686/13557)无细菌感染的患儿也使用了抗生素。基于临床评估数据和确诊诊断,采用多项逻辑回归方法建立了诊断模型。医生对细菌感染的诊断具有低敏感性(10%至 50%)和高特异性(90%至 100%),而临床诊断模型则为检测严重细菌感染提供了广泛的敏感性和特异性值。
急诊科医生往往低估了发热幼儿发生严重细菌感染的可能性,导致抗生素治疗不足。临床诊断模型可通过提高检测严重细菌感染的敏感性来改善决策,从而改善早期治疗。