Portland State University, Sociology, P.O. Box 751-SOC, Portland, OR 97207-0751, USA.
Qual Health Res. 2010 May;20(5):718-22. doi: 10.1177/1049732310364627.
In the two sections of this article, I examine aspects of the analysis and reporting of interaction in focus groups. In both sections, I argue that the essential importance of interaction for producing the data in focus groups does not correspond to any requirement that the analysis or the reporting of that data should emphasize interaction. With regard to analyzing interaction, the goals of the research should guide the analysis of the data, and those goals might or might not emphasize interaction. In particular, a great deal of focus group research is conducted for substantive and practical purposes, where the analysis typically requires little attention to the dynamics of interaction in those groups. With regard to reporting interaction, quotations from single individuals can often be the most efficient and effectives ways to accomplish an article's goals; however, I also discuss the kinds of situations where there are good reasons to report interaction among the participants. I conclude by briefly describing a different agenda for examining the importance of interaction in focus groups.
在本文的两个部分中,我考察了焦点小组分析和报告互动方面的内容。在这两个部分中,我认为互动对于产生焦点小组数据的重要性并不对应于任何要求,即数据分析或报告应该强调互动。就分析互动而言,研究的目标应该指导数据的分析,而这些目标可能强调也可能不强调互动。特别是,大量的焦点小组研究是出于实质性和实际目的进行的,在这种情况下,分析通常不需要过多关注这些小组互动的动态。就报告互动而言,来自单个个体的引语通常是实现文章目标的最有效和最有效的方式;然而,我也讨论了在某些情况下,有充分的理由报告参与者之间的互动。最后,我简要描述了一个不同的议程,用于研究焦点小组中互动的重要性。