Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, 3rd FloorSilverstein, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Apr 20;35(9 Suppl):S125-37. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d8342c.
Systematic review.
The objectives of this systematic review were to determine the patient and perioperative risk factors that contribute to infections after spine surgery and to examine the level of evidence to support the use of therapeutic interventions to reduce infection rates.
Infection continues to be one of the most common and feared complications after spine surgery. As such, it is used as a sentinel event for quality assurance processes. It is clear that the causes of infections after spine surgery are multifactorial and numerous patient- and procedure-related factors have been proposed as contributory elements. In addition, numerous perioperative adjuncts have been suggested to reduce infection rates.
A systematic review of the English-language literature (published between January 1990 and June 2009) was undertaken to identify articles examining risk factors associated with and adjunct treatment measures for preventing surgical-site infections. Two independent reviewers assessed the level of evidence quality using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria, and disagreements were resolved by consensus.
Of the 127 articles identified, 32 met the criteria to undergo full-text review. Individual patient, operative, and perioperative variables have been identified that are associated with increased infection rates (i.e., older age, obesity, diabetes, malnutrition, higher American Society of Anesthesiologists score, posterior approaches, and blood transfusions) but these variables have not been combined to provide individual patient risks based on a composite of factors (e.g., risk stratification). Of the surgical adjuncts investigated, only irrigation with dilute betadine solution showed moderate support for reducing infection rates.
It is clear that the causes of postoperative spinal site infections are multifactorial and related to a complex interplay of patient and procedural influences. Because of these complexities, for any individual and surgical procedure, predictable infection rates likely exist that do not extrapolate to 0. Although we have identified factors associated with increased infection rates, further studies will be required to allow multifactorial risk stratification for individual patients and to further investigate the use of therapeutic adjuncts.
系统回顾。
本系统回顾的目的是确定导致脊柱手术后感染的患者和围手术期危险因素,并检查支持使用治疗干预措施来降低感染率的证据水平。
感染仍然是脊柱手术后最常见和最令人恐惧的并发症之一。因此,它被用作质量保证过程的一个指标。很明显,脊柱手术后感染的原因是多因素的,许多与患者和手术相关的因素被认为是促成因素。此外,还提出了许多围手术期辅助措施来降低感染率。
对 1990 年 1 月至 2009 年 6 月期间发表的英文文献进行系统回顾,以确定研究与手术部位感染相关的危险因素和预防治疗措施的文章。两名独立的评审员使用推荐评估、制定和评估标准(Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria)评估证据质量水平,意见分歧通过协商解决。
在确定的 127 篇文章中,有 32 篇符合全文审查标准。已经确定了与感染率增加相关的个体患者、手术和围手术期变量(即年龄较大、肥胖、糖尿病、营养不良、美国麻醉医师协会评分较高、后路入路和输血),但这些变量尚未结合起来,根据因素的综合情况(例如,风险分层)来确定个体患者的风险。在所研究的手术辅助措施中,只有用稀释的 betadine 溶液冲洗显示出对降低感染率有适度的支持。
很明显,术后脊柱部位感染的原因是多因素的,与患者和手术影响的复杂相互作用有关。由于这些复杂性,对于任何个体和手术过程,可能存在可预测的感染率,而不是推断为 0。尽管我们已经确定了与感染率增加相关的因素,但还需要进一步的研究来允许对个体患者进行多因素风险分层,并进一步研究治疗辅助措施的应用。