Allergy and Asthma Medical Group and Research Center, San Diego, California 92123, USA.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2010 Apr;104(4):331-8. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2010.02.010.
Intranasal corticosteroids are first-line treatment for moderate-to-severe seasonal allergic rhinitis (AR).
To compare preferences for fluticasone furoate and fluticasone propionate nasal sprays after 1 week of treatment in patients with symptomatic seasonal AR.
Patients with seasonal AR were enrolled (n = 360) and randomized 1:1 to active treatment (fluticasone furoate, 110 microg, or fluticasone propionate, 200 microg, followed by crossover treatment for 1 week each) or matched placebo sequence with a 1-week washout before crossover dosing. Fluticasone furoate and fluticasone propionate efficacy was measured by change from baseline during 1 week in daily reflective total nasal symptom score (rTNSS) that assessed severity of rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, nasal itching, and sneezing. Patient preference for fluticasone furoate or fluticasone propionate was assessed at the end of the study by questionnaire.
Three hundred sixty patients from 29 clinical sites in the Unites States were randomized and treated between August 1, 2007 and November 30, 2007. Most patients were white (73%) and female (59%), with a mean age of 38.3 years, and had had seasonal AR for at least 10 years (74%). Fluticasone furoate and fluticasone propionate each reduced the daily rTNSS compared with their respective placebos (least squares mean [SD] difference, -0.8 [0.24], P < .001, and -0.6 [0.24], P = .01, respectively). More patients (P < .001) preferred fluticasone furoate to fluticasone propionate based on attributes of scent or odor (58% vs 27%), aftertaste (60% vs 18%), leaking out of the nose and down the throat (59% vs 21%), and mist gentleness (57% vs 26%). No statistically significant differences were seen in preferences regarding ease of use, delivery method, or device comfort.
Both fluticasone furoate and fluticasone propionate significantly improved symptoms in adult patients with seasonal AR. Most patients preferred the sensory attributes of fluticasone furoate to those of fluticasone propionate after 1 week of treatment.
鼻腔用皮质类固醇是治疗中重度季节性过敏性鼻炎(AR)的一线药物。
比较氟替卡松糠酸酯和丙酸氟替卡松鼻喷雾剂在治疗有症状的季节性 AR 患者 1 周后的偏好。
共纳入 360 例季节性 AR 患者(n=360),随机分为活性治疗组(氟替卡松糠酸酯 110μg,或丙酸氟替卡松 200μg,之后各治疗 1 周,然后交叉治疗)或匹配的安慰剂序列,在交叉给药前有 1 周洗脱期。氟替卡松糠酸酯和丙酸氟替卡松的疗效通过治疗 1 周时每日反射性总鼻症状评分(rTNSS)从基线的变化来衡量,该评分评估了流涕、鼻塞、鼻痒和打喷嚏的严重程度。研究结束时通过问卷评估患者对氟替卡松糠酸酯或丙酸氟替卡松的偏好。
360 例患者来自美国 29 个临床中心,于 2007 年 8 月 1 日至 2007 年 11 月 30 日随机接受治疗。大多数患者为白人(73%)和女性(59%),平均年龄 38.3 岁,至少有 10 年季节性 AR 病史(74%)。氟替卡松糠酸酯和丙酸氟替卡松均与各自的安慰剂相比降低了每日 rTNSS(最小二乘均值[SD]差异,-0.8[0.24],P<.001 和-0.6[0.24],P=.01)。更多的患者(P<.001)更喜欢氟替卡松糠酸酯而不是丙酸氟替卡松,因为前者的气味或味道(58%对 27%)、余味(60%对 18%)、漏出鼻腔和流到喉咙(59%对 21%)和喷雾柔和(57%对 26%)。在使用方便性、给药方式或设备舒适度方面,两种药物的偏好没有统计学差异。
氟替卡松糠酸酯和丙酸氟替卡松均显著改善了季节性 AR 成年患者的症状。在治疗 1 周后,大多数患者更喜欢氟替卡松糠酸酯的感官特性,而不是丙酸氟替卡松的感官特性。