• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于家庭血压监测的使用及报销的行动呼吁:执行摘要 美国心脏协会、美国高血压学会和预防心血管护士协会联合发表的科学声明

Call to action on use and reimbursement for home blood pressure monitoring: executive summary a joint scientific statement from the american heart association, american society of hypertension, and preventive cardiovascular nurses association.

作者信息

Pickering Thomas G, Miller Nancy Houston, Ogedegbe Gbenga, Krakoff Lawrence R, Artinian Nancy T, Goff David

出版信息

J Am Soc Hypertens. 2008 May-Jun;2(3):192-202. doi: 10.1016/j.jash.2008.04.006.

DOI:10.1016/j.jash.2008.04.006
PMID:20409902
Abstract

Home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) overcomes many of the limitations of traditional office blood pressure (BP) measurement and is both cheaper and easier to perform than ambulatory BP monitoring. Monitors that use the oscillometric method are currently available that are accurate, reliable, easy to use, and relatively inexpensive. An increasing number of patients are using them regularly to check their BP at home, but although this has been endorsed by national and international guidelines, detailed recommendations for their use have been lacking. There is a rapidly growing literature showing that measurements taken by patients at home are often lower than readings taken in the office and closer to the average BP recorded by 24-hour ambulatory monitors, which is the BP that best predicts cardiovascular risk. Because of the larger numbers of readings that can be taken by HBPM than in the office and the elimination of the white-coat effect (the increase of BP during an office visit), home readings are more reproducible than office readings and show better correlations with measures of target organ damage. In addition, prospective studies that have used multiple home readings to express the true BP have found that home BP predicts risk better than office BP (class IIa; level of evidence A). This call-to-action article makes the following recommendations: 1) It is recommended that HBPM should become a routine component of BP measurement in the majority of patients with known or suspected hypertension; 2) Patients should be advised to purchase oscillometric monitors that measure BP on the upper arm with an appropriate cuff size and that have been shown to be accurate according to standard international protocols. They should be shown how to use them by their healthcare providers; 3) Two to three readings should be taken while the subject is resting in the seated position, both in the morning and at night, over a period of 1 week. A total of >/=12 readings are recommended for making clinical decisions; 4) HBPM is indicated in patients with newly diagnosed or suspected hypertension, in whom it may distinguish between white-coat and sustained hypertension. If the results are equivocal, ambulatory BP monitoring may help to establish the diagnosis; 5) In patients with prehypertension, HBPM may be useful for detecting masked hypertension; 6) HBPM is recommended for evaluating the response to any type of antihypertensive treatment and may improve adherence; 7) The target HBPM goal for treatment is <135/85 mm Hg or <130/80 mm Hg in high-risk patients; 8) HBPM is useful in the elderly, in whom both BP variability and the white-coat effect are increased; 9) HBPM is of value in patients with diabetes, in whom tight BP control is of paramount importance; 10) Other populations in whom HBPM may be beneficial include pregnant women, children, and patients with kidney disease; and 11) HBPM has the potential to improve the quality of care while reducing costs and should be reimbursed.

摘要

家庭血压监测(HBPM)克服了传统诊室血压测量的许多局限性,并且比动态血压监测更便宜且易于操作。目前有采用示波法的血压监测仪,它们准确、可靠、使用方便且相对便宜。越来越多的患者定期在家中使用这些仪器来检测血压,尽管这已得到国内和国际指南的认可,但一直缺乏关于其使用的详细建议。有快速增长的文献表明,患者在家中测量的血压通常低于诊室测量值,且更接近24小时动态监测记录的平均血压,而后者是最能预测心血管风险的血压值。由于HBPM能够比诊室测量获取更多的读数,并且消除了白大衣效应(诊室就诊期间血压升高),家庭测量值比诊室测量值更具可重复性,并且与靶器官损害指标的相关性更好。此外,使用多次家庭测量值来表示真实血压的前瞻性研究发现,家庭血压比诊室血压能更好地预测风险(IIa类;证据水平A)。这篇行动呼吁文章提出以下建议:1)建议HBPM应成为大多数已知或疑似高血压患者血压测量的常规组成部分;2)应建议患者购买采用示波法、使用合适袖带尺寸在上臂测量血压且已根据国际标准方案证明准确的血压监测仪。医护人员应向患者展示如何使用这些仪器;3)在1周时间内,受试者应在早晨和晚上坐位休息时各测量2至3次读数。建议总共测量≥12次读数以用于临床决策;4)HBPM适用于新诊断或疑似高血压患者,它可以区分白大衣高血压和持续性高血压。如果结果不明确,动态血压监测可能有助于确诊;5)对于血压正常高值患者,HBPM可能有助于检测隐匿性高血压;6)建议使用HBPM评估任何类型降压治疗的反应,并可能提高依从性;7)治疗的HBPM目标值为<135/85 mmHg,高危患者为<130/80 mmHg;8)HBPM对老年人有用,他们的血压变异性和白大衣效应均增加;9)HBPM对糖尿病患者有价值,对他们而言严格控制血压至关重要;10)HBPM可能有益的其他人群包括孕妇、儿童和肾病患者;11)HBPM有潜力在降低成本的同时提高医疗质量,应予以报销。

相似文献

1
Call to action on use and reimbursement for home blood pressure monitoring: executive summary a joint scientific statement from the american heart association, american society of hypertension, and preventive cardiovascular nurses association.关于家庭血压监测的使用及报销的行动呼吁:执行摘要 美国心脏协会、美国高血压学会和预防心血管护士协会联合发表的科学声明
J Am Soc Hypertens. 2008 May-Jun;2(3):192-202. doi: 10.1016/j.jash.2008.04.006.
2
Call to action on use and reimbursement for home blood pressure monitoring: a joint scientific statement from the American Heart Association, American Society of Hypertension, and Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association.关于家庭血压监测的使用与报销的行动呼吁:美国心脏协会、美国高血压学会和预防心血管护士协会的联合科学声明
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2008 Jul-Aug;23(4):299-323. doi: 10.1097/01.JCN.0000317429.98844.04.
3
Call to action on use and reimbursement for home blood pressure monitoring: executive summary: a joint scientific statement from the American Heart Association, American Society Of Hypertension, and Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association.关于家庭血压监测的使用与报销的行动呼吁:执行摘要:美国心脏协会、美国高血压学会和预防心血管护士协会的联合科学声明
Hypertension. 2008 Jul;52(1):1-9. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.189011. Epub 2008 May 22.
4
Call to action on use and reimbursement for home blood pressure monitoring: Executive Summary. A joint scientific statement from the American Heart Association, American Society of Hypertension, and Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association.关于家庭血压监测使用与报销的行动呼吁:执行摘要。美国心脏协会、美国高血压学会和预防心血管护士协会联合发表的科学声明。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2008 Jun;10(6):467-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2008.08418.x.
5
Call to action on use and reimbursement for home blood pressure monitoring: a joint scientific statement from the American Heart Association, American Society Of Hypertension, and Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association.关于家庭血压监测的使用与报销的行动呼吁:美国心脏协会、美国高血压学会和预防心血管护士协会的联合科学声明
Hypertension. 2008 Jul;52(1):10-29. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.189010. Epub 2008 May 22.
6
Home blood pressure (BP) monitoring in kidney transplant recipients is more adequate to monitor BP than office BP.家庭血压(BP)监测在肾移植受者中比诊室血压更能充分监测血压。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011 Nov;26(11):3745-9. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfr143. Epub 2011 Mar 25.
7
Home blood pressure in children and adolescents: a comparison with office and ambulatory blood pressure measurements.儿童和青少年家庭血压:与诊室和动态血压测量的比较。
Acta Paediatr. 2011 Oct;100(10):e163-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2011.02300.x. Epub 2011 May 11.
8
Self-measurement of blood pressure in arterial hypertension--preliminary results from the AMPA study.动脉高血压患者的血压自我测量——AMPA研究的初步结果
Rev Port Cardiol. 2009 Jan;28(1):7-21.
9
Is home blood pressure monitoring useful in the management of patients with resistant hypertension?家庭血压监测在难治性高血压患者的管理中是否有用?
Am J Hypertens. 2015 Feb;28(2):190-9. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpu145. Epub 2014 Aug 20.
10
The reason why home blood pressure measurements are preferred over clinic or ambulatory blood pressure in Japan.在日本,人们更喜欢家庭血压测量而非诊所或动态血压监测的原因。
Hypertens Res. 2013 Aug;36(8):661-72. doi: 10.1038/hr.2013.38. Epub 2013 Apr 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Managing hypertension with ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.通过动态血压监测管理高血压。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2015 Feb;17(2):2. doi: 10.1007/s11886-014-0556-6.
2
Is it possible to manage hypertension and evaluate therapy without ambulatory blood pressure monitoring?是否可以在不进行动态血压监测的情况下管理高血压和评估治疗效果?
Curr Hypertens Rep. 2012 Aug;14(4):366-73. doi: 10.1007/s11906-012-0277-4.