Telethon Institute for Child Health Research, and Centre for Child Health Research, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
Clin Exp Immunol. 2010 Apr;160(1):22-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2010.04129.x.
Earlier iterations of the 'hygiene hypothesis', in which infections during childhood protect against allergic disease by stimulation of the T helper type 2 (Th2)-antagonistic Th1 immunity, have been supplanted progressively by a broader understanding of the complexities of the underlying cellular and molecular interactions. Most notably, it is now clear that whole certain types of microbial exposure, in particular from normal gastrointestinal flora, may provide key signals driving postnatal development of immune competence, including mechanisms responsible for natural resistance to allergic sensitization. Other types of infections can exert converse effects and promote allergic disease. We review below recent findings relating to both sides of this complex picture.
早期的“卫生假说”版本认为,儿童时期的感染通过刺激 Th2 拮抗型 Th1 免疫来预防过敏疾病,但随着对潜在细胞和分子相互作用复杂性的认识不断深入,这一假说逐渐被取代。最值得注意的是,现在已经很清楚,某些特定类型的微生物暴露,特别是来自正常胃肠道菌群的微生物暴露,可能提供关键信号,驱动出生后免疫能力的发展,包括负责对过敏致敏产生自然抵抗力的机制。其他类型的感染则可能产生相反的效果,促进过敏疾病的发生。我们在下面回顾了与这一复杂情况的两个方面相关的最新发现。