Rautava Samuli, Ruuskanen Olli, Ouwehand Arthur, Salminen Seppo, Isolauri Erika
Department of Pediatrics, Turku University Central Hospital, Finland.
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2004 Apr;38(4):378-88. doi: 10.1097/00005176-200404000-00004.
The hygiene hypothesis of atopic disease suggests that environmental changes in the industrialized world have lead to reduced microbial contact at an early age and thus resulted in the growing epidemic of atopic eczema, allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, and asthma. The epidemiological findings have been combined with the Th1/Th2 paradigm of immune responsiveness to provide a coherent theory. Recent advances in epidemiology and immunology demonstrate, however, that the hygiene hypothesis may need to be extended in three respects. First, the importance of infections in causing immune deviance may be outweighed by other sources of microbial stimulation, perhaps most importantly by the indigenous intestinal microbiota. Second, immunomodulatory and suppressive immune responses complement the Th1/Th2 paradigm. Third, in addition to protection against atopy, protection against infectious, inflammatory, and autoimmune diseases may also depend upon healthy host-microbe interactions implicated in the hygiene hypothesis.
特应性疾病的卫生假说表明,工业化世界的环境变化导致人们在幼年时期接触微生物的机会减少,进而导致特应性皮炎、过敏性鼻结膜炎和哮喘的发病率不断上升。流行病学研究结果与免疫反应的Th1/Th2范式相结合,形成了一个连贯的理论。然而,流行病学和免疫学的最新进展表明,卫生假说可能需要在三个方面加以扩展。第一,感染在导致免疫偏差方面的重要性可能被其他微生物刺激源所超越,也许最重要的是被肠道内的原生微生物群所超越。第二,免疫调节和抑制性免疫反应补充了Th1/Th2范式。第三,除了预防特应性疾病外,预防感染性、炎症性和自身免疫性疾病可能也依赖于卫生假说中所涉及的健康的宿主与微生物的相互作用。