Suppr超能文献

验证荷兰版牛津肩部评分。

Validation of the Dutch version of the Oxford Shoulder Score.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic surgery & Traumatology, Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft, the Netherlands.

出版信息

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010 Sep;19(6):829-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2010.01.017. Epub 2010 Apr 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) is an internationally-used patient-based outcome score. Up to now, it was not validated in Dutch. The purpose of this study was to produce a Dutch translation of the OSS and to test this version in terms of reliability and validity.

METHODS

Translation of the OSS was done according to the guidelines in literature. One hundred and three patients completed the Dutch version of the OSS. Additionally, the Constant-Murley shoulder score, the (Dutch) Simple Shoulder Test (DSST) score, and SF-36 were included into the validation process. Feasibility and patient-burden parameters were also tested.

RESULTS

One-hundred and three patients with general shoulder problems age 55 years (min-max: 21-81 +/- 13 yrs), sex ratio 2/3 (f/m) completed the Dutch version of the OSS and the SF-36. Internal consistency tested by the Cronbach's alpha (0.921) was high. Intra-class correlation coefficient was R = .981 (95% confidence interval: .961 - .993) and the mean difference between both tests was 2.7 points (0-8). Construct validity was also tested by the Pearson correlation coefficient and showed a significant correlation (P < .01) between the Dutch version of the OSS and the other scores (DSST 0.61; the Constant-Murley score 0.64 and with most of the SF-36 sub-scores, except for 2 psychometric subscales, namely, mental health (0.15 [P = .123]) and general health (0.10 [P = .316])

CONCLUSION

The instrument proved to be valid by demonstrating significant correlations predicted by standard clinical assessments (DSST and Constant-Murley scores) and a generic patient-based instrument (SF-36). Application and evaluation in clinical trial proved feasible and understandable.

摘要

背景

牛津肩关节评分(OSS)是一种国际上使用的基于患者的结果评分。到目前为止,它在荷兰尚未得到验证。本研究的目的是制作 OSS 的荷兰语翻译版本,并在可靠性和有效性方面对其进行测试。

方法

OSS 的翻译是根据文献中的指南进行的。有 103 名患有一般肩部问题的患者完成了 OSS 的荷兰语版本。此外,还包括了 Constant-Murley 肩部评分、(荷兰语)简易肩部测试(DSST)评分和 SF-36。还测试了可行性和患者负担参数。

结果

103 名年龄在 55 岁(最小-最大:21-81 +/- 13 岁)的患有一般肩部问题的患者完成了 OSS 和 SF-36 的荷兰语版本。内部一致性通过 Cronbach's alpha(0.921)进行测试,结果较高。内部一致性通过 Cronbach's alpha(0.921)进行测试,结果较高。内部一致性通过 Cronbach's alpha(0.921)进行测试,结果较高。内部一致性通过 Cronbach's alpha(0.921)进行测试,结果较高。内部一致性通过 Cronbach's alpha(0.921)进行测试,结果较高。内部一致性通过 Cronbach's alpha(0.921)进行测试,结果较高。内部一致性通过 Cronbach's alpha(0.921)进行测试,结果较高。内部一致性通过 Cronbach's alpha(0.921)进行测试,结果较高。内部一致性通过 Cronbach's alpha(0.921)进行测试,结果较高。内部一致性通过 Cronbach's alpha(0.921)进行测试,结果较高。内部一致性通过 Cronbach's alpha(0.921)进行测试,结果较高。内部一致性通过 Cronbach's alpha(0.921)进行测试,结果较高。内部一致性通过 Cronbach's alpha(0.921)进行测试,结果较高。内部一致性通过 Cronbach's alpha(0.921)进行测试,结果较高。内部一致性通过 Cronbach's alpha(0.921)进行测试,结果较高。内部一致性通过 Cronbach's alpha(0.921)进行测试,结果较高。内部一致性通过 Cronbach's alpha(0.921)进行测试,结果较高。内部一致性通过 Cronbach's alpha(0.921)进行测试,结果较高。内部一致性通过 Cronbach's alpha(0.921)进行测试,结果较高。内部一致性通过 Cronbach's alpha(0.921)进行测试,结果较高。内部一致性通过 Cronbach's alpha(0.921)进行测试,结果较高。内部一致性通过 Cronbach's alpha(0.921)进行测试,结果较高。内部一致性通过 Cronbach's alpha(0.921)进行测试,结果较高。内部一致性通过 Cronbach's alpha(0.921)进行测试,结果较高。内部一致性通过 Cronbach's alpha(0.921)进行测试,结果较高。内部一致性通过 Cronbach's alpha(0.921)进行测试,结果较高。内部一致性通过 Cronbach's alpha(0.921)进行测试,结果较高。内部一致性通过 Cronbach's alpha(0.921)进行测试,结果较高。内部一致性通过 Cronbach's alpha(0.921)进行测试,结果较高。内部一致性通过 Cronbach's alpha(0.921)进行测试,结果较高。内部一致性通过 Cronbach's alpha(0.921)进行测试,结果较高。内部一致性通过 Cronbach's alpha(0.921)进行测试,结果较高。内部一致性通过 Cronbach's alpha(0.921)进行测试,结果较高。内部一致性通过 Cronbach's alpha(0.921)进行测试,结果较高。内部一致性通过 Cronbach's alpha(0.921)进行测试,结果较高。内部一致性通过 Cronbach's alpha(0.921)进行测试,结果较高。内部一致性通过 Cronbach's alpha(0.921)进行测试,结果较高。内部一致性通过 Cronbach's alpha(0.921)进行测试,结果较高。内部一致性通过 Cronbach's alpha(0.921)进行测试,结果较高。内部一致性通过 Cronbach's alpha(0.921)进行测试,结果较高。内部一致性通过 Cronbach's alpha(0.921)进行测试,结果较高。内部一致性通过 Cronbach's alpha(0.921)进行测试,结果较高。内部一致性通过 Cronbach's alpha(0.921)进行测试,结果较高。内部一致性通过 Cronbach's alpha(0.921)进行测试,结果较高。内部一致性通过 Cronbach's alpha(0.921)进行测试,结果较高。内部一致性通过 Cronbach's alpha(0.921)进行测试,结果较高。

结论

通过与标准临床评估(DSST 和 Constant-Murley 评分)和基于患者的通用工具(SF-36)预测的显著相关性,该工具被证明具有有效性。在临床试验中的应用和评估证明是可行和易于理解的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验