Suppr超能文献

多发性硬化功能复合:一种有临床意义的残疾衡量指标。

The multiple sclerosis functional composite: a clinically meaningful measure of disability.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, VU Medical Centre, Free University Hospital, PO Box 7057, Amsterdam, 1007 MB, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Neurology. 2010 Apr 27;74 Suppl 3:S8-15. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181dbb571.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) provides a focused and sensitive evaluation of disability in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) that may be more responsive to change than that provided by the Expanded Disability Status Scale.

EXPERT CLINICAL OPINION

The MSFC is a 3-part quantitative instrument that measures arm, leg, and cognitive function with the 9-Hole Peg Test (arm/hand dexterity), the Timed 25-Foot Walk (leg function), and the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (3-second version, PASAT3; cognition). The MSFC has excellent test-retest reliability. Construct validity was supported by expected differences in scores between patients with primary or secondary progressive MS compared with relapsing-remitting MS. Concurrent validity was demonstrated by significant correlations with the Expanded Disability Status Scale, the Sickness Impact Profile, and the Short Form-36, particularly on the physical components of the latter 2 scales. MSFC scores also correlate with MRI changes. Limitations of the MSFC include practice effects with the PASAT and to a lesser extent the 9-Hole Peg Test, variations in the reference populations used to calculate Z-scores, and the lack of an accepted definition of a clinically meaningful change.

FUTURE DIRECTIONS

Future research should be directed at adding a test that measures visual function (e.g., contrast acuity), at replacing the PASAT by a cognition test that has better measurement characteristics, and at developing methods to better understand the clinical relevance of changes in MSFC scores.

摘要

背景

多发性硬化功能综合评定(MSFC)为多发性硬化症(MS)患者提供了一种集中且敏感的残疾评估,其相较于扩展残疾状况量表(EDSS)可能更具变化响应性。

专家临床意见

MSFC 是一个由 3 部分组成的定量工具,用于测量手臂、腿部和认知功能,使用 9 孔钉测试(手臂/手部灵巧度)、定时 25 英尺步行(腿部功能)和 Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test(3 秒版本,PASAT3;认知功能)。MSFC 具有出色的重测信度。结构效度通过原发性或进展性 MS 患者与复发性缓解型 MS 患者之间的预期分数差异得到支持。同时,它与 EDSS、Sickness Impact Profile 和 Short Form-36(尤其是后两个量表的生理成分)之间存在显著相关性,这证明了其具有同时效度。MSFC 评分也与 MRI 变化相关。MSFC 的局限性包括 PASAT 存在练习效应,而在较小程度上 9 孔钉测试也存在练习效应,用于计算 Z 分数的参考人群存在差异,以及缺乏对临床有意义的变化的定义。

未来方向

未来的研究应致力于增加一项用于测量视觉功能(例如对比敏锐度)的测试,用具有更好测量特性的认知测试取代 PASAT,并开发方法来更好地理解 MSFC 评分变化的临床相关性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验