Suppr超能文献

在活体供肾肾移植中,预先肾移植能否确保更长的移植物存活时间?单中心研究。

Can preemptive kidney transplantation guarantee longer graft survival in living-donor kidney transplantation? Single-center study.

作者信息

Jung G O, Moon J I, Kim J M, Choi G-S, Kwon C H D, Cho J-W, Kim S-J

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Transplant Proc. 2010 Apr;42(3):766-74. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.02.050.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The benefit of preemptive kidney transplantation (KTx) for graft survival compared with nonpreemptive KTx is controversial.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the influence of preemptive KTx on graft survival.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study included 476 of 531 patients who had undergone living-donor KTx between January 2000 and June 2007. Pediatric patients and those who had previously undergone KTx were excluded. Recipients were divided into 2 groups; group 1 included 413 patients (86.8%) who received grafts after institution of maintenance dialysis, and group 2 included 63 patients (13.2%) who underwent preemptive KTx.

RESULTS

Donor type and HLA mismatch demonstrated significant differences between the 2 groups. Group 1 had more living donors and fewer HLA mismatches. Warm ischemia time in group 2 was significantly shorter than in group 1. The serum creatinine concentration in group 1 on postoperative day 7 was significantly higher than in group 2. Five- and 10-year graft survival in groups 1 and 2, respectively, were 95.3% and 81.3% vs 92.9% and 92.9%. Graft survival was not significant insofar as duration and method of dialysis. At our institution, independent risk factors for graft survival in living-donor KTx are primary end-stage renal disease, acute cellular rejection episodes, and recipient age.

CONCLUSION

We observed no benefit on graft survival in recipients of living-donor KTx insofar as whether they had undergone previous dialysis.

摘要

引言

与非抢先式肾移植相比,抢先式肾移植对移植物存活的益处存在争议。

目的

分析抢先式肾移植对移植物存活的影响。

患者与方法

本研究纳入了2000年1月至2007年6月间接受活体供肾肾移植的531例患者中的476例。排除儿科患者及既往接受过肾移植的患者。受者分为2组;第1组包括413例患者(86.8%),他们在开始维持性透析后接受移植,第2组包括63例患者(13.2%),他们接受了抢先式肾移植。

结果

两组之间供体类型和HLA错配存在显著差异。第1组有更多的活体供体且HLA错配更少。第2组的热缺血时间明显短于第1组。第1组术后第7天的血清肌酐浓度明显高于第2组。第1组和第2组的5年和10年移植物存活率分别为95.3%和81.3%,对比92.9%和92.9%。就透析时间和方法而言,移植物存活无显著差异。在我们机构,活体供肾肾移植中移植物存活的独立危险因素是原发性终末期肾病、急性细胞排斥反应发作和受者年龄。

结论

就既往是否接受透析而言,我们未观察到抢先式肾移植受者在移植物存活方面有任何益处。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验