University of Sao Paulo, School of Physical Education and Sport, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Int J Sports Med. 2010 Aug;31(8):590-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1252054. Epub 2010 Apr 29.
Blood pressure (BP) assessment during resistance exercise can be useful to avoid high BP, reducing cardiovascular risk, especially in hypertensive individuals. However, non-invasive accurate technique for this purpose is not available. The aim of this study was to compare finger photoplethysmographic (FPP) and intra-arterial BP values and responses during resistance exercise. Eight non-medicated hypertensive subjects (5 males, 30-60 years) were evaluated during pre-exercise resting period and during three sets of the knee extension exercise performed at 80% of 1RM until fatigue. BP was measured simultaneously by FPP and intra-arterial methods. Data are mean+/-SD. Systolic BP was significantly higher with FPP than with intra-arterial: at pre-exercise (157+/-13 vs. 152+/-10 mmHg; p<0.01) and the mean (202+/-29 vs. 198+/-26 mmHg; p<0.01), and the maximal (240+/-26 vs. 234+/-16 mmHg; p<0.05) values achieved during exercise. The increase in systolic BP during resistance exercise was similar between FPP and intra-arterial (+73+/-29 vs. +71+/-18 mmHg; p=0.59). Diastolic BP values and increases were lower with FPP. In conclusion, FPP provides similar values of BP increment during resistance exercise than intra-arterial method. However, it overestimates by 2.6+/-6.1% the maximal systolic BP achieved during this mode of exercise and underestimates by 8.8+/-5.8% the maximal diastolic BP.
血压(BP)评估在阻力运动中可以有用,以避免高血压,降低心血管风险,特别是在高血压个体中。然而,目前还没有用于此目的的非侵入性精确技术。本研究的目的是比较手指光体积描记法(FPP)和动脉内 BP 值和反应在阻力运动期间。八名非药物治疗的高血压患者(5 名男性,30-60 岁)在运动前休息期间和在三个 80%的 1RM 进行的膝关节伸展运动中进行评估,直到疲劳。BP 通过 FPP 和动脉内方法同时测量。数据为平均值+/-SD。收缩压用 FPP 测量明显高于动脉内:在运动前(157+/-13 对 152+/-10 mmHg;p<0.01)和平均值(202+/-29 对 198+/-26 mmHg;p<0.01),以及运动期间达到的最大值(240+/-26 对 234+/-16 mmHg;p<0.05)。阻力运动期间收缩压的增加在 FPP 和动脉内之间相似(+73+/-29 对 +71+/-18 mmHg;p=0.59)。FPP 下舒张压值和增加较低。总之,FPP 在阻力运动期间提供与动脉内方法相似的 BP 增量值。然而,它高估了 2.6+/-6.1%在这种运动模式下达到的最大收缩压,并低估了 8.8+/-5.8%达到的最大舒张压。