Peer review reviewed by a peer.
作者信息
Fogelholm M
出版信息
Obes Rev. 2010 Mar;11(3):169-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2009.00671.x.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Peer review reviewed by a peer.同行评审由同行进行评审。
Obes Rev. 2010 Mar;11(3):169-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2009.00671.x.
2
[Debate on peer review. Report from an international congress on peer review].[同行评议辩论。关于同行评议的国际大会报告]
Lakartidningen. 2002 Jul 25;99(30-31):3109-10.
3
Post-publication review could aid skills and quality.发表后评审有助于提升技能和质量。
Nature. 2007 Jul 26;448(7152):408. doi: 10.1038/448408d.
4
Peer review could be improved by market forces.同行评审可以通过市场力量得到改善。
Nature. 2006 Feb 16;439(7078):782. doi: 10.1038/439782c.
5
Biomedical publishing. Secretive and subjective, peer review proves resistant to study.生物医学出版。同行评审隐秘且主观，事实证明难以对其进行研究。
Science. 2013 Sep 20;341(6152):1331. doi: 10.1126/science.341.6152.1331.
6
How to avoid the reviewer's axe: one editor's view.如何避免被审稿人毙掉：一位编辑的观点。
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2004 Jan;51(1):127-30.
7
What do we know about peer review?我们对同行评审了解多少？
Psychol Med. 1996 Sep;26(5):883-6. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700035224.
8
Referee bias.
Nature. 1994 Jan 13;367(6459):108. doi: 10.1038/367108c0.
9
Reviewing in science requires quality criteria and professional reviewers.科学领域的评审需要质量标准和专业评审人员。
Eur J Cell Biol. 2004 Apr;83(3):93-5. doi: 10.1078/0171-9335-00367.
10
Expert bias in peer review.同行评审中的专家偏见。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2011 Dec;27(12):2229-33. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2011.624090. Epub 2011 Oct 12.
Zotero 插件