Wong Raymond C, Sinha Arvind Kumar, Mahadevan Malcolm, Yeo Tiong Cheng
Cardiac Department, National University Heart Centre, National University Hospital, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Road, Level 3 Main Building, Singapore, Singapore, 119074.
Emerg Radiol. 2010 Sep;17(5):375-80. doi: 10.1007/s10140-010-0874-y. Epub 2010 May 2.
Conventional emergency department (EMD) approach to triaging acute chest pain syndromes may lead to unnecessary admissions, resulting to in-hospital bed occupancy and increased healthcare costs. We explore the diagnostic utility of early (less than a week) outpatient scheduled single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in intermediate-risk chest pain subjects who presented to EMD with non-diagnostic electrocardiogram and negative serum troponin level. Additionally, we intend to study the safety and cost-effectiveness of such a strategy. We conduct a prospective, non-randomized study of 108 subjects who fit the inclusion criteria. After SPECT studies, all subjects were evaluated in the cardiac clinic within 2 weeks of EMD visits. Final diagnosis of coronary artery disease and subsequent disposition to standard medical therapy or follow-on angiography were decided by incorporating pre-test clinical data and SPECT results. Adverse events defined as myocardial infarction and cardiac death was tracked between EMD visit and eventual therapy (either medical therapy or coronary revascularization). Finally, cost-effectiveness was determined based on estimated cost and days of hospitalization saved between standard strategies of ward admission for further evaluation versus the present early outpatient SPECT-based workflow. Among 108 subjects (mean age 58 years, 59% male) included for analysis, 82 (76%) had normal perfusion status. There was no statistical difference in baseline characteristics and prior ischemic heart disease history between groups. In the 26 abnormal perfusion subjects, seven had follow-on coronary angiography in which three were found to have significant stenotic coronary lesions, but only one had intervention performed. There was an unscheduled coronary angiography in the normal perfusion group that yielded normal coronary anatomy. There was no adverse clinical event in both groups. Compared with standard strategy, early outpatient SPECT initiated by EMD physicians followed by cardiac clinic evaluation resulted in 2.9 days of hospitalization or $781.23 saved per patient per EMD visit. EMD-initiated early SPECT studies followed by cardiac clinic evaluation in intermediate-risk acute chest pain syndromes with non-diagnostic ECG and negative serum troponin levels carries excellent diagnostic and therapeutic utility, in addition to being safe and cost-effective.
传统急诊科(EMD)对急性胸痛综合征进行分诊的方法可能会导致不必要的住院,进而导致医院床位占用率增加和医疗成本上升。我们探讨了早期(少于一周)门诊预约单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)对中度风险胸痛患者的诊断效用,这些患者因心电图检查无诊断意义且血清肌钙蛋白水平为阴性而就诊于EMD。此外,我们打算研究这种策略的安全性和成本效益。我们对108名符合纳入标准的受试者进行了一项前瞻性、非随机研究。在进行SPECT检查后,所有受试者在EMD就诊后2周内在心脏科门诊接受评估。通过纳入检查前临床数据和SPECT结果,确定冠状动脉疾病的最终诊断以及随后接受标准药物治疗或后续血管造影的情况。在EMD就诊至最终治疗(药物治疗或冠状动脉血运重建)期间,追踪定义为心肌梗死和心源性死亡的不良事件。最后,根据估计成本以及与标准的病房入院进一步评估策略相比,当前基于早期门诊SPECT的工作流程节省的住院天数,确定成本效益。在纳入分析的108名受试者(平均年龄58岁,59%为男性)中,82名(76%)灌注状态正常。两组之间的基线特征和既往缺血性心脏病病史无统计学差异。在26名灌注异常的受试者中,7名接受了后续冠状动脉造影,其中3名被发现有严重的冠状动脉狭窄病变,但只有1名接受了干预。在灌注正常组中有1例非计划冠状动脉造影,结果显示冠状动脉解剖结构正常。两组均未发生不良临床事件。与标准策略相比,由EMD医生启动早期门诊SPECT,随后进行心脏科门诊评估,每次EMD就诊可使每位患者节省2.9天的住院时间或781.23美元。对于心电图检查无诊断意义且血清肌钙蛋白水平为阴性的中度风险急性胸痛综合征,由EMD启动早期SPECT检查,随后进行心脏科门诊评估,除了安全且具有成本效益外,还具有出色的诊断和治疗效用。