Institute for Social Medicine, Epidemiology, and Health Economics, Charité Medical Center, Berlin, Germany.
J Pain. 2010 May;11(5):431-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2009.08.010.
The aim of this paper was to quantify the influence of the physician's training and experience in the field of acupuncture on the outcome in patients with chronic pain. Patients visiting their physician because of chronic low back pain, headache, pain due to osteoarthritis of the knee or hip, or neck pain, were included in 4 multicenter, randomized, controlled studies. All patients received routine care; patients in the acupuncture groups received additional acupuncture treatment (on average 10 sessions). The data was pooled, and the 3-month change from baseline of the SF-36 bodily pain subscale as the main outcome defined. A total of 9,990 patients (mean age 49.6 +/- 13.6 years, 68% female) treated by 2,781 physicians (mean age 46.3 +/- 7 years, 37% female) were analyzed. The physicians had 7.3 +/- 5.2 (mean +/- sd) years of experience in acupuncture and their mean duration of formal acupuncture training had been 287 +/- 321 hours. The outcome was markedly improved in the acupuncture group. We identified only 1 physician characteristic with a significant influence on the outcome: Internists performed better (odds ratio OR = 1.49, confidence interval CI: 1.01;2.18; P = .043); orthopedists worse (OR = .79, CI: .62;1; P = .043) than the average physician. Neither the duration of training nor the duration of experience had any impact on the extent of the acupuncture effect.
In this analysis, physician characteristics such as training did not influence patients' outcome after acupuncture, suggesting that formal training parameters have only a limited influence on treatment effect. Other skills such as the therapeutic relationship, which are difficult to measure, may probably play a more important role and should be taken into consideration.
本文旨在量化医师在针灸领域的培训和经验对慢性疼痛患者治疗效果的影响。
将患有慢性下腰痛、头痛、膝关节或髋关节骨关节炎疼痛、颈痛的患者纳入 4 项多中心、随机、对照研究。所有患者均接受常规治疗;针灸组患者在此基础上接受额外的针灸治疗(平均 10 次)。汇总数据,将 SF-36 躯体疼痛子量表作为主要结局的 3 个月时与基线相比的变化来定义。共分析了 9990 例患者(平均年龄 49.6 ± 13.6 岁,68%为女性)和 2781 名医生(平均年龄 46.3 ± 7 岁,37%为女性)。医师的针灸经验为 7.3 ± 5.2(均数 ± 标准差)年,接受正式针灸培训的平均时长为 287 ± 321 小时。针灸组的结局明显改善。我们仅发现 1 个与结局有显著相关性的医师特征:内科医生的疗效优于平均水平(优势比 OR = 1.49,95%置信区间 CI:1.01;2.18;P =.043);而骨科医生的疗效则差于平均水平(OR =.79,CI:.62;1;P =.043)。培训时长和经验时长均与针灸疗效无关。
在本分析中,医师的特征(如培训)并不影响针灸治疗后的患者结局,表明正式的培训参数对治疗效果的影响有限。其他技能(如治疗关系)可能更为重要,但难以测量,应加以考虑。