Dawson Alan G, Hosmane Sharath
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZN, UK.
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010 Aug;11(2):178-81. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2010.235853. Epub 2010 May 3.
A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was 'Should you place one or two chest drains in patients undergoing lobectomy?' Altogether >200 papers were found using the reported search, of which six represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated. We conclude that the insertion of one chest drain confers less postoperative pain as shown by one randomised controlled trial (RCT) and one further cohort study. In addition, another RCT was able to demonstrate a lower use of non-standard analgesia in the face of no overall difference in total pain score while another RCT conveyed a significantly shorter duration of opioid and NSAID use inferring less postoperative pain. From all the studies in this area, no differences in the duration and amount of drainage or the length of hospital stay could be demonstrated with any significance. Therefore, the use of the conventional two drain method is not superior to the one drain method and may indeed cause more pain and is obviously more expensive.
一篇心脏外科领域的最佳证据主题文章是按照结构化方案撰写的。所探讨的问题是“在接受肺叶切除术的患者中应放置一根还是两根胸腔引流管?”通过报告的检索共找到200多篇论文,其中6篇代表了回答该临床问题的最佳证据。这些论文的作者、期刊、出版日期和国家、所研究的患者群体、研究类型、相关结局和结果均列于表格中。我们得出结论,一项随机对照试验(RCT)和另一项队列研究表明,插入一根胸腔引流管术后疼痛较轻。此外,另一项RCT能够证明在总疼痛评分无总体差异的情况下,非标准镇痛药物的使用较少,而另一项RCT表明阿片类药物和非甾体抗炎药的使用时间显著缩短,这意味着术后疼痛较轻。从该领域的所有研究来看,引流持续时间和引流量或住院时间方面均未显示出任何显著差异。因此,传统的两根引流管方法并不优于一根引流管方法,实际上可能会导致更多疼痛,而且显然成本更高。