Cardiovascular Clinic Bad Neustadt, Bad Neustadt, Germany.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010 Jun;37(6):1332-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.01.006. Epub 2010 May 4.
Unilateral cerebral perfusion for brain protection is gaining increasing interest, although the pathways of collateral flow as well as many aspects of the surgical strategy regarding optimal perfusion pressure, flow and temperature remain unclear. This study evaluates the differences between right- and left-sided unilateral cerebral perfusion, if any, especially with regard to neurovascular monitoring findings and clinical outcome.
Between January 2005 and April 2008, 200 consecutive patients underwent elective aortic arch surgery at our facility. One-hundred patients were selected for left-sided unilateral cerebral perfusion supplying the brain through the left common carotid artery and another 100 patients for unilateral cerebral perfusion supplying the brain through the right-sided carotid and vertebral arteries. Arterial return of the cardiopulmonary bypass and the unilateral cerebral perfusion were performed in all patients via cannulation of a corresponding carotid artery using a side graft.
Arch repair was performed under mild hypothermic circulatory arrest with a rectal temperature of 30.1 + or - 1.8 degrees C and 31.6 + or - 1.6 degrees C in the left- and right-sided cerebral perfusion, respectively. The duration of circulatory arrest with unilateral cerebral perfusion was identical for both groups (17.2 + or - 2 min). Brain perfusion was performed through the arterial line at a blood temperature of 28 degrees C and a flow rate of 0.9 + or - 0.2 l min(-1) on the left and 1.5 + or - 0.3 l min(-1) on the right. The flow velocities in the median cerebral artery contralateral to the side being perfused revealed no differences between the groups. There was no 30-day mortality. Two patients (one in each group) with severe calcification of the aortic valve suffered minor strokes.
Unilateral cerebral perfusion under mild hypothermia is an efficient method of cerebral protection. The advantage of the right-sided perfusion in which two brain-supplying arteries are perfused could not be verified.
单侧脑灌注在脑保护方面的应用日益受到关注,但侧支循环的途径以及关于最佳灌注压、流量和温度的许多手术策略方面仍不清楚。本研究旨在评估左右侧单侧脑灌注之间是否存在差异,如果有差异,特别是在神经血管监测结果和临床结果方面。
2005 年 1 月至 2008 年 4 月期间,我院对 200 例择期主动脉弓手术患者进行了研究。其中 100 例患者采用左侧单侧脑灌注,通过左侧颈总动脉为大脑供血,另 100 例患者采用右侧颈内动脉和椎动脉单侧脑灌注。所有患者均通过侧支架对相应颈动脉进行插管,进行体外循环和单侧脑灌注的动脉回输。
手术在直肠温度为 30.1 + 或 - 1.8 摄氏度和 31.6 + 或 - 1.6 摄氏度的轻度低温循环中断下进行,左侧和右侧单侧脑灌注的温度分别为 30.1 + 或 - 1.8 摄氏度和 31.6 + 或 - 1.6 摄氏度。两组单侧脑灌注的循环中断时间相同(17.2 + 或 - 2 分钟)。脑灌注通过动脉线进行,血液温度为 28 摄氏度,流量为 0.9 + 或 - 0.2 l min(-1) ,左侧流量为 1.5 + 或 - 0.3 l min(-1) ,右侧流量为 1.5 + 或 - 0.3 l min(-1) 。与灌注侧相对应的大脑中动脉的血流速度在两组之间没有差异。没有 30 天死亡率。两名患者(每组一名)患有严重的主动脉瓣钙化,发生了轻微中风。
轻度低温下的单侧脑灌注是一种有效的脑保护方法。右侧灌注(两条脑供血动脉均灌注)的优势尚未得到证实。