Department of Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Asklepios Hospital St. Georg, Hamburg.
Institute of Medical Informatics, Statistics, and Epidemiology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig.
Ann Oncol. 2010 Nov;21(11):2255-2261. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdq235. Epub 2010 May 5.
BACKGROUND: We aimed to determine safety and efficacy of rituximab (R) in combination with repetitive high-dose therapy (HDT) as primary treatment for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients aged 18-60 years and elevated lactate dehydrogenase were treated with four cycles of MegaCHOEP and transplantation of autologous stem cells after cycles 2, 3 and 4. Rituximab (375 mg/m²) was given before each cycle and 12 and 33 days after start of the last cycle of chemotherapy. Sixty-four patients given R-MegaCHOEP were compared with 29 patients who had received identical treatment without rituximab. RESULTS: Overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) after 3 years were significantly improved in patients treated with R-MegaCHOEP (OS: 78.7% versus 55.0%, P = 0.045; EFS: 72.7% versus 47.2%, P = 0.013). In a Cox regression model adjusted for performance status and stage, relative risk of treatment failure was lower (relative risk 0.5, P = 0.041) and OS was better (relative risk 0.4, P = 0.054) for patients given R-MegaCHOEP. Grade 3/4 infections were more frequent in the R-MegaCHOEP group (18.5% versus 6.0%, P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of rituximab to MegaCHOEP significantly improved outcome in young patients with high-risk DLBCL. The higher incidence of grade 3/4 infections needs consideration when rituximab and HDT regimens are combined.
背景:我们旨在确定利妥昔单抗(R)联合重复高剂量治疗(HDT)作为弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)的主要治疗方法的安全性和有效性。
患者和方法:年龄在 18-60 岁之间且乳酸脱氢酶升高的患者接受了四个周期的 MegaCHOEP 治疗,并在第 2、3 和 4 个周期后进行了自体干细胞移植。在每个周期之前以及最后一个周期化疗开始后 12 天和 33 天给予利妥昔单抗(375mg/m²)。将 64 例接受 R-MegaCHOEP 治疗的患者与 29 例未接受利妥昔单抗治疗的患者进行了比较。
结果:接受 R-MegaCHOEP 治疗的患者 3 年后的总生存率(OS)和无事件生存率(EFS)显著提高(OS:78.7%对 55.0%,P=0.045;EFS:72.7%对 47.2%,P=0.013)。在调整了表现状态和分期的 Cox 回归模型中,治疗失败的相对风险较低(相对风险 0.5,P=0.041),OS 更好(相对风险 0.4,P=0.054),对于接受 R-MegaCHOEP 的患者。R-MegaCHOEP 组的 3/4 级感染更为常见(18.5%对 6.0%,P=0.003)。
结论:利妥昔单抗联合 MegaCHOEP 显著改善了高危 DLBCL 年轻患者的预后。在利妥昔单抗和 HDT 方案联合使用时,需要考虑 3/4 级感染的发生率较高的问题。
Future Oncol. 2015