Respiratory Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
Curr Oncol Rep. 2010 Jul;12(4):226-34. doi: 10.1007/s11912-010-0111-6.
Over the past few years there has been a great deal of debate about the status of lung cancer screening. The debate has focused on at least three areas: the unmet need to prove a mortality reduction from the screening tests being studied, the potential for these screening tests to produce harm, and the possible cost-effectiveness of an image-based screening program. In this manuscript, I review the chest imaging cohort and controlled trials that have been added to the evidence base over the past few years. I then discuss the evidence related to the areas that are currently debated, describe the ongoing trials that will help to clarify these issues, and speculate about the future.
在过去的几年里,关于肺癌筛查的地位问题存在着大量的争论。这场争论主要集中在至少三个方面:尚未证明正在研究的筛查测试可降低死亡率,这些筛查测试可能产生危害,以及基于图像的筛查计划的可能成本效益。在本文中,我回顾了过去几年中为证据基础增加的胸部成像队列和对照试验。然后,我讨论了与当前争议领域相关的证据,描述了正在进行的有助于澄清这些问题的试验,并对未来进行了推测。