Taller S, Srám J, Lukás R, Krivohlávek M
Traumatologicko-ortopedické centrum se spinální jednotkou, Krajská nemocnice Liberec, a.s.
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2010 Apr;77(2):93-8.
The Stoppa approach used in acetabular and pelvic ring fractures provides an excellent visualisation of the anterior column, quadrilateral plate and part of the posterior column for its exact reduction. Our first experience of this surgical approach and preliminary results are reported.
Between April 2008 and September 2009, the Stoppa approach was used 15 times in 14 patients. This series includes 13 males and one female with an average age of 47.7 years. The mean follow-up was 6.8 months (range from 3 to 15) in 11 patients. In three patients, the post-operative period was too short for evaluation. The surgical procedure is described in detail and associated risks are rated. The Harris hip score was used for clinical evaluation. Radiographic results were assessed according to the criteria described by Matta and Pohlemann.
Ten patients suffered from an isolated acetabular fracture, two displayed an acetabular fracture combined with the pelvic ring injury. An isolated pelvic ring fracture was identified in one patient. One patient sustained an acetabular and pelvic ring fracture at one side associated with a simple pelvic ring injury contra-laterally. In five cases, surgery was carried out using three approaches; two approaches were used in another five patients. In remaining five cases, an isolated Stoppa approach was used. An exact anatomical or satisfactory reconstruction of the acetabulum was achieved in 10 patients; in three patients a poor result with 5-mm displacement was found. The pelvic ring fractures were anatomically reduced in two patients. The average Harris hip score in nine patients was 85 points (range from 70 to 95). No serious intra-operative vascular or nerve damage was detected, deep wound infection was revealed in one case.
The Stoppa approach makes the surgery of the anterior column and quadrilateral plate easier. It can be combined with other surgical techniques, usually with an approach using an "iliac window" over the iliac crest or with a Kocher-Langenbeck's approach. Indications for this type of surgery include acetabular fractures, combined acetabular and pelvic ring fractures and pelvic ring fractures without an injury to the acetabulum as well. Compared to the conventional ilioinguinal approach, the Stoppa approach is less extensive and does not endanger integrity of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve. It facilitates the treatment of fractures in the posterior part of the quadrilateral plate because the visual control of reduction allows us to restore anatomical conditions. Some technical problems may occur if the screws inserted from the posterior approach into the fracture line of the inner acetabular surface, in order to stabilise the posterior column, interfere with an exact reduction. The use of a narrow plate for stabilisation of comminuted fractures of the quadrilateral plate may create problems as well.
The Stoppa approach changes the conditions for treatment of acetabular and pelvic ring fractures fundamentally. It affords an excellent visualisation of the anterior column and quadrilateral plate and allows for an exact reduction and stable fixation of their fractures. In combination with other approaches it permits anatomic reconstruction of the most serious fractures of the acetabulum and pelvic ring.
髋臼和骨盆环骨折采用的Stoppa入路能很好地显露前柱、四边形板及部分后柱,利于精确复位。本文报告了我们对该手术入路的首次经验及初步结果。
2008年4月至2009年9月,14例患者共采用Stoppa入路15次。该组包括13例男性和1例女性,平均年龄47.7岁。11例患者的平均随访时间为6.8个月(3至15个月)。3例患者术后时间过短,无法进行评估。详细描述了手术步骤并对相关风险进行了评级。采用Harris髋关节评分进行临床评估。根据Matta和Pohlemann描述的标准评估影像学结果。
10例患者为单纯髋臼骨折,2例为髋臼骨折合并骨盆环损伤。1例患者为单纯骨盆环骨折。1例患者一侧髋臼和骨盆环骨折,对侧为单纯骨盆环损伤。5例手术采用了三种入路;另外5例患者采用了两种入路。其余5例采用单纯Stoppa入路。10例患者实现了髋臼的精确解剖复位或满意重建;3例患者复位效果不佳,存在5毫米的移位。2例患者的骨盆环骨折实现了解剖复位。9例患者的Harris髋关节评分平均为85分(70至95分)。术中未检测到严重的血管或神经损伤,1例出现深部伤口感染。
Stoppa入路使前柱和四边形板的手术操作更容易。它可与其他手术技术联合使用,通常是与髂嵴上方的“髂骨窗”入路或Kocher-Langenbeck入路联合。这类手术的适应证包括髋臼骨折、髋臼和骨盆环联合骨折以及未累及髋臼的骨盆环骨折。与传统的髂腹股沟入路相比,Stoppa入路范围较小,不会危及股外侧皮神经的完整性。它便于处理四边形板后部的骨折,因为复位的视觉控制使我们能够恢复解剖结构。如果从后方入路向髋臼内表面骨折线插入螺钉以稳定后柱,可能会干扰精确复位,从而出现一些技术问题。使用窄钢板固定四边形板的粉碎性骨折也可能产生问题。
Stoppa入路从根本上改变了髋臼和骨盆环骨折的治疗条件。它能很好地显露前柱和四边形板,实现骨折的精确复位和稳定固定。与其他入路联合使用时,可对髋臼和骨盆环最严重的骨折进行解剖重建。