King's College London, National Nursing Research Unit, James Clerk Maxwell Building, Waterloo Rd, London SE1 8WA, United Kingdom.
Int J Nurs Stud. 2010 Aug;47(8):937-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.03.004. Epub 2010 May 5.
This classic methods paper (Bland and Altman, 2010) considers the assessment of agreement between measures, an often overlooked aspect of assessing measurements taken for use in research and practice and (re) introduces the ubiquitous 'Bland Altman' procedures for assessing agreement. The importance of these procedures is high and they address issues that are not always considered in research which uses measurement scales or describes the characteristics of scales developed for use in clinical practice. Many widely used approaches for reliability assessment can fail to consider the agreement between measures at all and can give an entirely misleading impression of an instrument's suitability for use in research or practice.
这篇经典方法论文(Bland 和 Altman,2010)探讨了评估测量之间的一致性,这是评估用于研究和实践中的测量的一个经常被忽视的方面,并(重新)介绍了普遍存在的“ Bland Altman”程序,用于评估一致性。这些程序非常重要,它们解决了在使用测量量表或描述为临床实践开发的量表的特征的研究中,并不总是被考虑到的问题。许多广泛使用的可靠性评估方法可能根本不考虑测量之间的一致性,并且可能会对仪器在研究或实践中的适用性产生完全误导的印象。