Suppr超能文献

会阴切开术愈合评估:发红、水肿、瘀斑、分泌物、切口对合情况(REEDA)量表的可靠性。

Episiotomy healing assessment: Redness, Oedema, Ecchymosis, Discharge, Approximation (REEDA) scale reliability.

作者信息

Alvarenga Marina Barreto, Francisco Adriana Amorim, de Oliveira Sonia Maria Junqueira Vasconcellos, da Silva Flora Maria Barbosa, Shimoda Gilcéria Tochika, Damiani Lucas Petri

机构信息

Escola de Artes, Ciências e Humanidades, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.

Escola de Enfermagem, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2015 Jan-Feb;23(1):162-8. doi: 10.1590/0104-1169.3633.2538.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

to analyse the Redness, Oedema, Ecchymosis, Discharge, Approximation (REEDA) scale reliability when evaluating perineal healing after a normal delivery with a right mediolateral episiotomy.

METHOD

observational study based on data from a clinical trial conducted with 54 randomly selected women, who had their perineal healing assessed at four time points, from 6 hours to 10 days after delivery, by nurses trained in the use of this scale. The kappa coefficient was used in the reliability analysis of the REEDA scale.

RESULTS

the results indicate good agreement in the evaluation of the discharge item (0.75< Kappa ≥0.88), marginal and good agreement in the first three assessments of oedema (0.16< Kappa ≥0.46), marginal agreement in the evaluation of ecchymosis (0.25< Kappa ≥0.42) and good agreement regarding redness (0.46< Kappa ≥0.66). For the item coaptation, the agreement decreased from excellent in the first assessment to good in the last assessment. In the fourth evaluation, the assessment of all items displayed excellent or good agreement among the evaluators.

CONCLUSION

the difference in the scores among the evaluators when applying the scale indicates that this tool must be improved to allow an accurate assessment of the episiotomy healing process.

摘要

目的

分析在评估正常分娩并进行右侧会阴侧切术后会阴愈合情况时,红、肿、瘀斑、分泌物、切口对合(REEDA)量表的可靠性。

方法

基于一项临床试验数据的观察性研究,该试验对54名随机选取的女性进行,由接受过该量表使用培训的护士在产后6小时至10天的四个时间点对她们的会阴愈合情况进行评估。kappa系数用于REEDA量表的可靠性分析。

结果

结果表明,在分泌物项目评估中一致性良好(0.75<kappa≥0.88),在水肿的前三次评估中一致性为边缘和良好(0.16<kappa≥0.46),在瘀斑评估中一致性为边缘(0.25<kappa≥0.42),在发红方面一致性良好(0.46<kappa≥0.66)。对于切口对合项目,一致性从第一次评估时的优秀降至最后一次评估时的良好。在第四次评估中,所有项目的评估在评估者之间显示出优秀或良好的一致性。

结论

应用该量表时评估者之间得分的差异表明,必须改进此工具,以便准确评估会阴侧切术的愈合过程。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50cb/4376045/43ecb8956444/0104-1169-rlae-23-01-00162-gf01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验