Suppr超能文献

长期护理中的监管偏好。

The taste for regulation in long-term care.

机构信息

Department of Community Health, Brown University, 121 South Main Street, Providence, RI 02912, USA.

出版信息

Med Care Res Rev. 2010 Aug;67(4 Suppl):38S-64S. doi: 10.1177/1077558710367655. Epub 2010 May 6.

Abstract

Concerns about the quality of long-term care have resulted in an extensive array of regulations governing provider behavior. This article reports the results of a survey of 1,147 long-term care specialists on issues related to the government's performance in assuring quality and improving care. With the exception of providers, more than half of specialists ranked the quality of the average nursing home as fair or poor; home health agencies and even assisted-living facilities fared only somewhat better. Yet despite the perceived ineffectiveness of the current regime, the majority of specialists expressed a general willingness to continue pursuing more stringent and enhanced enforcement and to proceed down the same path with assisted-living facilities. Furthermore, while most were not sanguine about public reporting, the majority favored pay-for-performance, even though both rely on the same information. In addition to constituency group affiliation, differences in views derived largely from respondents' ideological predispositions.

摘要

人们对长期护理质量的担忧已经导致了大量的法规来规范服务提供者的行为。本文报告了对 1147 名长期护理专家进行的一项调查结果,这些专家就政府在确保质量和改善护理方面的表现相关问题发表了意见。除了服务提供者,超过一半的专家将平均养老院的护理质量评为一般或较差;家庭健康机构,甚至辅助生活设施的情况也只是稍好一些。然而,尽管人们认为现行制度无效,但大多数专家表示,他们普遍愿意继续加强和强化执法,并对辅助生活设施采取同样的措施。此外,尽管大多数人对公共报告并不乐观,但大多数人赞成按绩效付费,即使这两者都依赖于相同的信息。除了选区团体的隶属关系外,观点的差异主要源于受访者的意识形态倾向。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验