Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research and Schools of Social Work and Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Institute on Aging, College of Urban and Public Affairs and School of Public Health, Oregon Health and Science University-Portland State University, Portland, OR, USA.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2022 Feb;23(2):225-234. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2021.12.004. Epub 2021 Dec 31.
Assisted living (AL) has existed in the United States for decades, evolving in response to older adults' need for supportive care and distaste for nursing homes and older models of congregate care. AL is state-regulated, provides at least 2 meals a day, around-the-clock supervision, and help with personal care, but is not licensed as a nursing home. The key constructs of AL as originally conceived were to provide person-centered care and promote quality of life through supportive and responsive services to meet scheduled and unscheduled needs for assistance, an operating philosophy emphasizing resident choice, and a residential environment with homelike features. As AL has expanded to constitute half of all long-term care beds, the increasing involvement of the real estate, hospitality, and health care sectors has raised concerns about the variability of AL, the quality of AL, and standards for AL. Although the intent to promote person-centered care and quality of life has remained, those key constructs have become mired under tensions related to models of AL, regulation, financing, resident acuity, and the workforce. These tensions have resulted in a model of care that is not as intended, and which must be reimagined if it is to be an affordable care option truly providing quality, person-centered care in a suitable environment. Toward that end, 25 stakeholders representing diverse perspectives conferred during 2 half-day retreats to identify the key tensions in AL and discuss potential solutions. This article presents the background regarding those tensions, as well as potential solutions that have been borne out, paving the path to a better future of assisted living.
辅助生活(AL)在美国已经存在了几十年,它是为了满足老年人对支持性护理的需求,以及对养老院和旧模式集体护理的不满而演变而来的。AL 是由州监管的,提供至少 2 餐/天、24 小时监督以及个人护理帮助,但不具备作为养老院的资质。最初构想的 AL 的关键结构是提供以患者为中心的护理,并通过支持性和响应性的服务来提高生活质量,以满足有计划和无计划的援助需求,这种运营理念强调患者选择,以及具有家庭般特征的居住环境。随着 AL 的扩展,已经构成了所有长期护理床位的一半,房地产、酒店和医疗保健行业的日益参与引发了人们对 AL 的可变性、AL 的质量以及 AL 标准的担忧。尽管促进以患者为中心的护理和生活质量的意图仍然存在,但这些关键结构已经陷入了与 AL 模式、监管、融资、患者病情严重程度以及劳动力相关的紧张关系之中。这些紧张关系导致了一种护理模式与初衷不符,如果要成为一种真正提供优质、以患者为中心的护理,并在合适环境中提供的负担得起的护理选择,就必须对其进行重新构想。为此,代表不同观点的 25 名利益相关者在为期两天的半封闭式务虚会上进行了探讨,以确定 AL 中的关键紧张关系,并讨论潜在的解决方案。本文介绍了这些紧张关系的背景,以及已经产生的潜在解决方案,为辅助生活的美好未来铺平了道路。