• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[转基因植物衍生食品的安全性评估]

[Safety assessment of foods derived from genetically modified plants].

作者信息

Pöting A, Schauzu M

机构信息

Bundesinstitut für Risikobewertung, Berlin.

出版信息

Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2010 Jun;53(6):583-8. doi: 10.1007/s00103-010-1062-7.

DOI:10.1007/s00103-010-1062-7
PMID:20449554
Abstract

The placing of genetically modified plants and derived food on the market falls under Regulation (EC) No. 1829/2003. According to this regulation, applicants need to perform a safety assessment according to the Guidance Document of the Scientific Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), which is based on internationally agreed recommendations. This article gives an overview of the underlying legislation as well as the strategy and scientific criteria for the safety assessment, which should generally be based on the concept of substantial equivalence and carried out in relation to an unmodified conventional counterpart. Besides the intended genetic modification, potential unintended changes also have to be assessed with regard to potential adverse effects for the consumer. All genetically modified plants and derived food products, which have been evaluated by EFSA so far, were considered to be as safe as products derived from the respective conventional plants.

摘要

转基因植物及其衍生食品投放市场受欧盟第1829/2003号法规监管。根据该法规,申请者需依据欧洲食品安全局(EFSA)转基因生物科学小组的指导文件进行安全评估,该指导文件基于国际公认的建议。本文概述了相关基础法规以及安全评估的策略和科学标准,安全评估通常应基于实质等同概念,并针对未改性的传统对应物进行。除了预期的基因改造外,还必须评估潜在的非预期变化对消费者的潜在不利影响。迄今为止,欧洲食品安全局评估的所有转基因植物及其衍生食品都被认为与相应传统植物衍生的产品一样安全。

相似文献

1
[Safety assessment of foods derived from genetically modified plants].[转基因植物衍生食品的安全性评估]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2010 Jun;53(6):583-8. doi: 10.1007/s00103-010-1062-7.
2
[Safety aspects of novel foods].[新型食品的安全问题]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2010 Jun;53(6):577-82. doi: 10.1007/s00103-010-1064-5.
3
[Safety of food additives from a German and European point of view].
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2010 Jun;53(6):554-60. doi: 10.1007/s00103-010-1073-4.
4
Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.转基因植物及其衍生食品和饲料的安全性与营养评估:动物饲养试验的作用
Food Chem Toxicol. 2008 Mar;46 Suppl 1:S2-70. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2008.02.008. Epub 2008 Feb 13.
5
[Safety of food contact materials].[食品接触材料的安全性]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2010 Jun;53(6):561-6. doi: 10.1007/s00103-010-1063-6.
6
[Scientific policy advice on food safety provided by the Senate Commission on Food Safety].[参议院食品安全委员会提供的关于食品安全的科学政策建议]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2010 Jun;53(6):548-53. doi: 10.1007/s00103-010-1065-4.
7
[Consumer health protection].[消费者健康保护]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2010 Jun;53(6):525-7. doi: 10.1007/s00103-010-1069-0.
8
[Genetically modified plants and food safety. State of the art and discussion in the European Union].[转基因植物与食品安全。欧盟的现状与讨论]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2004 Sep;47(9):826-33. doi: 10.1007/s00103-004-0894-4.
9
[Assessment of allergenicity of genetically modified food crops].[转基因粮食作物致敏性评估]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2012 Mar;55(3):402-7. doi: 10.1007/s00103-011-1426-7.
10
[Plant protection products and their residues : Aspects of consumer safety in context of the new EU regulations].[植物保护产品及其残留:新欧盟法规背景下的消费者安全问题]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2010 Jun;53(6):567-76. doi: 10.1007/s00103-010-1068-1.