Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, Spain.
Rev Esp Cardiol. 2010 May;63(5):536-43. doi: 10.1016/s1885-5857(10)70115-8.
The aim was to evaluate the usefulness of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) for the preoperative functional anatomical assessment of patients with aortic regurgitation (AR) to identify those eligible for valve-sparing surgery (VSS).
We determined the accuracy and diagnostic value of TEE for identifying underlying lesions and mechanisms in 66 patients who underwent surgery for severe AR by comparing TEE findings with those obtained on surgical inspection. The usefulness of TEE for predicting the feasibility of VSS was determined.
The overall diagnostic accuracy of TEE was excellent (87%, kappa=0.82), with valve prolapse being the principle cause of discrepancy between the methods (in 23/27 cases; 85%). Three anatomical forms of dilatation of the ascending aorta (AA) were correctly classified (accuracy >88%; kappa 0.83): supratubal aneurysm (19 patients), aortic root aneurysm (4), and annuloaortic ectasia (24). The mechanism underlying AR was identified with an accuracy of 85% (kappa 0.8) and there was a significant association between the type of mechanism identified by TEE and the success of VSS (P< .001): VSS was successful in 73% of patients with dilatation of a functional annulus (i.e. with tethering), but aortic valve replacement was required in 78% with prolapses, 90% with thickened leaflets with restricted movement, and 100% with perforation. There was also a relationship between the type of aneurysm and the technique required for AA replacement (P=.004).
Use of TEE enabled the mechanism underlying AR to be accurately identified. There was a high level of agreement with surgical inspection and the technique was useful for predicting the feasibility of VSS and the surgical procedure for AA replacement.
本研究旨在评估经食管超声心动图(TEE)在主动脉瓣反流(AR)患者术前功能解剖评估中的作用,以确定适合保留瓣膜手术(VSS)的患者。
我们通过比较 TEE 检查结果与手术检查结果,确定 66 例因严重 AR 接受手术的患者的 TEE 在识别潜在病变和机制方面的准确性和诊断价值。确定 TEE 预测 VSS 可行性的作用。
TEE 的总体诊断准确性非常高(87%,kappa=0.82),其中瓣膜脱垂是两种方法之间差异的主要原因(27 例中有 23 例;85%)。三种升主动脉(AA)扩张的解剖形式被正确分类(准确性>88%;kappa 0.83):窦管交界上方动脉瘤(19 例)、主动脉根部动脉瘤(4 例)和瓣环扩张(24 例)。AR 的机制识别准确性为 85%(kappa 0.8),TEE 识别的机制类型与 VSS 的成功与否有显著关联(P<.001):功能瓣环扩张(即有牵拉)患者的 VSS 成功率为 73%,但脱垂患者需要主动脉瓣置换的比例为 78%,瓣叶增厚活动受限的患者为 90%,穿孔的患者为 100%。动脉瘤的类型与 AA 置换所需的技术之间也存在关系(P=.004)。
TEE 能够准确识别 AR 的发病机制。与手术检查具有高度一致性,对于预测 VSS 的可行性和 AA 置换的手术方法具有重要作用。