Clinical and Practice Research Group, School of Pharmacy, Queen's University Belfast, UK.
J Hosp Infect. 2010 Sep;76(1):36-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2010.03.006. Epub 2010 May 7.
The aim of this cluster randomised controlled trial was to test the impact of an infection control education and training programme on meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) prevalence in nursing homes. Nursing homes were randomised to intervention (infection control education and training programme; N=16) or control (usual practice continued; N=16). Staff in intervention homes were educated and trained (0, 3 and 6 months) in the principles and implementation of good infection control practice with infection control audits conducted in all sites (0, 3, 6 and 12 months) to assess compliance with good practice. Audit scores were fed back to nursing home managers in intervention homes, together with a written report indicating where practice could be improved. Nasal swabs were taken from all consenting residents and staff at 0, 3, 6 and 12 months. The primary outcome was MRSA prevalence in residents and staff, and the secondary outcome was a change in infection control audit scores. In all, 793 residents and 338 staff were recruited at baseline. MRSA prevalence did not change during the study in residents or staff. The relative risk of a resident being colonised with MRSA in an intervention home compared with a control home at 12 months was 0.99 (95% confidence interval: 0.69, 1.42) after adjustment for clustering. Mean infection control audit scores were significantly higher in the intervention homes (82%) compared with the control homes (64%) at 12 months (P<0.0001). Consideration should be given to other approaches which may help to reduce MRSA in this setting.
本整群随机对照试验的目的是检验感染控制教育和培训计划对疗养院耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)流行率的影响。疗养院被随机分为干预组(感染控制教育和培训计划;N=16)或对照组(继续常规实践;N=16)。干预组的工作人员接受了感染控制原则和良好感染控制实践实施方面的教育和培训(0、3 和 6 个月),并在所有地点进行感染控制审计(0、3、6 和 12 个月),以评估良好实践的遵守情况。审计分数反馈给干预组的疗养院经理,并附有一份书面报告,指出可以改进的实践。在 0、3、6 和 12 个月时,从所有同意的居民和工作人员中采集鼻拭子。主要结局是居民和工作人员中 MRSA 的流行率,次要结局是感染控制审计分数的变化。在基线时,共招募了 793 名居民和 338 名工作人员。在研究期间,居民和工作人员的 MRSA 流行率没有变化。与对照组相比,干预组居民在 12 个月时感染 MRSA 的相对风险为 0.99(95%置信区间:0.69,1.42),调整聚类后。干预组的感染控制审计平均得分(82%)明显高于对照组(64%)(P<0.0001)。在这种情况下,应考虑其他可能有助于减少 MRSA 的方法。