IDIBELL, Infectious Diseases Service, Hospital de Bellvitge, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2009 Dec;15 Suppl 7:26-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.03093.x.
Owing to a high prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) among residents, long-term-care facilities (LTCFs) have become substantial reservoirs of this microorganism. Few data on the natural history of MRSA colonization in this setting are available. The cumulative incidence appears to be approximately 20% per year, and more than half of carriers have persistent colonization. Several host-related factors, such as antibiotic use, invasive devices, and poor infection control practices, increase the risk of colonization. Clinical experience suggests that subsequent MRSA infections are neither frequent nor severe while colonized residents are living in an LTCF; however, when admitted to an acute-care centre, colonized individuals may spread MRSA to other patients and may develop severe infections. Therefore, the epidemiological impact of the high prevalence of MRSA in these centres is more relevant than the clinical impact of this colonization for an individual resident. Standard precautions should be applied as routine infection control measures for all residents of LTCFs, whereas barrier precautions, cohorting, decolonization and other measures should be undertaken only for controlling outbreaks of MRSA infection.
由于居民中耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌 (MRSA) 的高发率,长期护理机构 (LTCF) 已成为这种微生物的重要储库。关于这种环境中 MRSA 定植的自然史的数据很少。累积发病率约为每年 20%,超过一半的携带者存在持续性定植。一些与宿主相关的因素,如抗生素使用、侵入性器械和感染控制措施不佳,会增加定植的风险。临床经验表明,在 LTCF 中定植的居民随后发生 MRSA 感染的频率既不高也不严重;然而,当他们被收治到急性护理中心时,定植个体可能会将 MRSA 传播给其他患者,并可能发生严重感染。因此,对于这些中心 MRSA 高流行率的流行病学影响比对个体居民的定植的临床影响更为重要。标准预防措施应作为 LTCF 所有居民的常规感染控制措施,而屏障预防措施、群体隔离、去定植和其他措施仅应在控制 MRSA 感染爆发时使用。