Departamento de Personalidad, Evaluación y Tratamiento Psicológico, Universidad de Granada, Campus de Cartuja, s/n, 18071 Granada, Spain.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011 Jan;35(3):377-406. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.04.008. Epub 2010 May 6.
Most substance abusers simultaneously use and abuse more than one substance, even when there is a clear drug of choice. This pattern creates a great challenge in relating neuropsychological findings in drug users to a certain drug. This review aims to: (i) discuss results from neuropsychological studies using different research methodologies that may improve our understanding of specific vs. generalized effects of different drugs on neuropsychological performance; and (ii) determine which neuropsychological mechanisms are impaired in the same way by the use of different drugs, and which impairments are specific to certain substances, including cannabis, psychostimulants, opioids and alcohol. We review evidence from human studies in chronic substance abusers using three methodologies: (i) studies on 'pure' users of one particular substance, (ii) studies that methodologically control the effects of drugs co-abused, and (iii) studies contrasting subgroups of polysubstance users with different drugs of choice. Converging evidence from these approaches indicates that all the drugs studied are commonly associated with significant alterations in the neuropsychological domains of episodic memory, emotional processing, and the executive components of updating and decision-making. However, there is evidence of a greater reliability in the association of certain substances with specific neuropsychological domains. Specifically, there are relatively more robust effects of psychostimulants and alcohol use on impulsive action and cognitive flexibility, of alcohol and MDMA use on spatial processing, perceptual speed and selective attention, cannabis and methamphetamine on prospective memory deficits, and cannabis and MDMA on processing speed and complex planning. The magnitude of both generalized and specific neuropsychological effects is overall attenuated in samples achieving long-term abstinence, but there are persistent psychostimulant-related effects on updating, inhibition, flexibility and emotional processing, and opioid-related effects on updating and decision-making.
大多数物质滥用者同时使用和滥用一种以上的物质,即使有一种明确的首选药物。这种模式给将药物使用者的神经心理学发现与特定药物联系起来带来了巨大的挑战。本综述旨在:(i)讨论使用不同研究方法的神经心理学研究结果,这些方法可能有助于我们理解不同药物对神经心理学表现的特定和普遍影响;(ii)确定哪些神经心理学机制受到不同药物的使用以相同的方式受损,以及哪些损伤是特定于某些物质的,包括大麻、精神兴奋剂、阿片类药物和酒精。我们使用三种方法综述了慢性物质滥用者的人类研究证据:(i)对一种特定物质的“纯”使用者进行的研究;(ii)方法上控制共同滥用药物影响的研究;(iii)比较不同药物选择的多药物使用者亚组的研究。这些方法的一致证据表明,所有研究的药物都与情景记忆、情绪处理以及更新和决策执行等神经心理学领域的显著改变有关。然而,有证据表明某些物质与特定神经心理学领域的关联具有更高的可靠性。具体而言,与冲动行为和认知灵活性相关的物质更普遍的影响是兴奋剂和酒精,与空间处理、知觉速度和选择性注意力相关的物质是酒精和 MDMA,与前瞻性记忆缺陷相关的物质是大麻和冰毒,与处理速度和复杂规划相关的物质是大麻和 MDMA。在长期戒断的样本中,总体上,一般性和特定性神经心理学效应的幅度都有所减弱,但更新、抑制、灵活性和情绪处理方面仍存在兴奋剂相关的影响,更新和决策制定方面仍存在阿片类药物相关的影响。