• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

直肠癌术前放化疗后影像学检查的前瞻性评估。

Prospective assessment of imaging after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer.

机构信息

Department of Medical-Diagnostic Sciences and Special Therapies, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.

出版信息

Surgery. 2011 Jan;149(1):56-64. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2010.03.025. Epub 2010 May 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.surg.2010.03.025
PMID:20452636
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to assess the accuracy of imaging techniques in predicting pathologic tumor (ypT), node (ypN) stages and the circumferential resection margin (ypCRM) status of rectal cancers after preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT).

METHODS

Using pelvic computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and endorectal ultrasound (ERUS), 90 consecutive patients with locally advanced mid-to-low rectal cancer were prospectively assessed. Postirradiation T and N stages and infiltration of the CRM, as assessed by CT, MRI and ERUS, were compared with histopathologic findings.

RESULTS

The accuracy of ypT staging was low, whatever the imaging technique used (37% by CT, 34% by MRI, and 27% by ERUS), the most frequent inaccuracy being overstaging. Imaging showed a good specificity and good negative predictive values (NPV) when mural staging was grouped into ypT ≤ 3 and ypT4 categories; in particular, ERUS achieved a 92% specificity and 95% NPV. CRM involvement was correctly predicted in 71% of patients by CT (74% specificity; 93% NPV) and in 85% by MRI (88% specificity; 95% NPV). The accuracy for nodal staging was 62%, 68%, and 65% by CT, MRI and ERUS, respectively; the corresponding NPV were 88%, 78%, and 76%.

CONCLUSION

Current imaging techniques are inaccurate in restaging rectal cancer after CRT but are useful in predicting T ≤ 3 tumors, cases with negative nodes and tumor-free CRM. These findings may be of clinical relevance for planning less invasive surgery.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估影像学技术在预测局部中低位直肠癌患者新辅助放化疗(CRT)后肿瘤病理分期(ypT)、淋巴结(ypN)分期和环周切缘(ypCRM)状态的准确性。

方法

对 90 例局部进展期中低位直肠癌患者进行前瞻性评估,使用盆腔计算机断层扫描(CT)、磁共振成像(MRI)和直肠内超声(ERUS)。比较 CT、MRI 和 ERUS 评估的照射后 T 分期和 N 分期以及 CRM 浸润与组织病理学检查结果。

结果

无论使用哪种影像学技术,ypT 分期的准确性均较低(CT 为 37%,MRI 为 34%,ERUS 为 27%),最常见的不准确是过度分期。当将壁层分期分为 ypT≤3 和 ypT4 两类时,影像学检查具有良好的特异性和良好的阴性预测值(NPV);特别是 ERUS 具有 92%的特异性和 95%的 NPV。CT 正确预测了 71%(74%的特异性;93%的 NPV)患者的 CRM 受累情况,MRI 正确预测了 85%(88%的特异性;95%的 NPV)患者的 CRM 受累情况。CT、MRI 和 ERUS 对淋巴结分期的准确性分别为 62%、68%和 65%,相应的 NPV 分别为 88%、78%和 76%。

结论

目前的影像学技术在 CRT 后对直肠癌进行再分期并不准确,但对于预测 T≤3 肿瘤、无淋巴结转移和肿瘤无切缘的病例具有一定的预测价值。这些发现可能对计划侵袭性较低的手术具有临床意义。

相似文献

1
Prospective assessment of imaging after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer.直肠癌术前放化疗后影像学检查的前瞻性评估。
Surgery. 2011 Jan;149(1):56-64. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2010.03.025. Epub 2010 May 10.
2
Magnetic resonance imaging accuracy in assessing tumour down-staging following chemoradiation in rectal cancer.磁共振成像在评估直肠癌放化疗后肿瘤降期方面的准确性。
Colorectal Dis. 2009 Mar;11(3):249-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01593.x. Epub 2008 May 29.
3
The potential of restaging in the prediction of pathologic response after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer.直肠癌术前放化疗后再分期在预测病理反应中的潜力。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Feb;14(2):455-61. doi: 10.1245/s10434-006-9269-4. Epub 2006 Dec 2.
4
Prognostic implications of the distribution of lymph node metastases in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.新辅助放化疗后直肠癌淋巴结转移分布的预后意义
J Clin Oncol. 2008 May 1;26(13):2106-11. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.7704. Epub 2008 Mar 24.
5
The prognostic value of lymph node metastases and tumour regression grade in rectal cancer patients treated with long-course preoperative chemoradiotherapy.长期术前放化疗治疗的直肠癌患者中淋巴结转移和肿瘤退缩分级的预后价值
Colorectal Dis. 2009 Mar;11(3):264-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01599.x. Epub 2008 Jun 20.
6
Clinically-staged T3N0 rectal cancer: is preoperative chemoradiotherapy the optimal treatment?临床分期为 T3N0 的直肠癌:术前放化疗是最佳治疗方法吗?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 Mar;17(3):838-45. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0796-7. Epub 2009 Dec 12.
7
Magnetic resonance imaging in rectal cancer downstaged using neoadjuvant chemoradiation: accuracy of prediction of tumour stage and circumferential resection margin status.新辅助放化疗后降期直肠癌的磁共振成像:肿瘤分期及环周切缘状态预测的准确性
Colorectal Dis. 2008 Jun;10(5):479-89. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01451.x. Epub 2008 Mar 3.
8
Pathologic nodal classification is the most discriminating prognostic factor for disease-free survival in rectal cancer patients treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy and curative resection.病理性淋巴结分类是术前放化疗和根治性切除治疗的直肠癌患者无病生存的最具鉴别力的预后因素。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Jul 15;77(4):1158-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.06.019. Epub 2009 Sep 30.
9
Optimal surgery time after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancers.局部晚期直肠癌术前放化疗后的最佳手术时间
Ann Surg. 2008 Aug;248(2):243-51. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31817fc2a0.
10
[Comparative diagnosis of locally advanced rectal carcinoma after preoperative therapy].
Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd. 1998;115:1404-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Imaging Assessment of the Response to Neoadjuvant Treatment in Rectal Cancer in Relation to Postoperative Pathological Outcomes.直肠癌新辅助治疗反应的影像学评估与术后病理结果的关系
Curr Health Sci J. 2024 Oct-Dec;50(5):585-598. doi: 10.12865/CHSJ.50.04.13. Epub 2024 Dec 31.
2
Endoscopic and imaging evaluations of the primary tumor response in patients with proficient mismatch repair colorectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant combination immunotherapy.新辅助联合免疫治疗的错配修复功能正常的结直肠癌患者原发肿瘤反应的内镜及影像学评估
Tech Coloproctol. 2025 Jan 16;29(1):47. doi: 10.1007/s10151-024-03088-x.
3
The predicting value of post neoadjuvant treatment magnetic resonance imaging: a meta-analysis.
新辅助治疗后磁共振成像的预测价值:荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Nov;38(11):6846-6853. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11084-3. Epub 2024 Aug 22.
4
Restaging rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.新辅助放化疗后直肠癌的再分期
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2023 May 15;15(5):700-712. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v15.i5.700.
5
Establishment and validation of nomograms for predicting mesorectal lymph node staging and restaging.建立和验证预测中直肠淋巴结分期和再分期的列线图。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2022 Sep;37(9):2069-2083. doi: 10.1007/s00384-022-04244-1. Epub 2022 Aug 26.
6
The predictive value of tumor volume reduction ratio on three-dimensional endorectal ultrasound for tumor response to chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer.三维直肠内超声测量的肿瘤体积缩小率对局部晚期直肠癌放化疗疗效的预测价值
Ann Transl Med. 2022 Jun;10(12):666. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-2418.
7
Preoperative T and N Restaging of Rectal Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy: An Accuracy Comparison Between MSCT and MRI.新辅助放化疗后直肠癌术前T和N分期:多层螺旋CT与磁共振成像的准确性比较
Front Oncol. 2022 Jan 21;11:806749. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.806749. eCollection 2021.
8
Prediction of tumor response of rectal cancer cells via 3D cell culture and cytotoxicity assay before initiating preoperative chemoradiotherapy.在开始术前放化疗之前,通过三维细胞培养和细胞毒性试验预测直肠癌细胞的肿瘤反应。
Oncol Lett. 2019 Oct;18(4):3863-3872. doi: 10.3892/ol.2019.10702. Epub 2019 Aug 2.
9
The value of oxaliplatin in the systemic treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer.奥沙利铂在局部晚期直肠癌全身治疗中的价值。
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2018 Aug;9(4):631-640. doi: 10.21037/jgo.2018.06.02.
10
Advances for achieving a pathological complete response for rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy.新辅助治疗后直肠癌实现病理完全缓解的进展。
Chronic Dis Transl Med. 2016 Jul 28;2(1):10-16. doi: 10.1016/j.cdtm.2016.06.001. eCollection 2016 Mar.