Cui Jian, Fang Hui, Zhang Lin, Wu Yun-Long, Zhang Hai-Zeng
Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.
Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.
Chronic Dis Transl Med. 2016 Jul 28;2(1):10-16. doi: 10.1016/j.cdtm.2016.06.001. eCollection 2016 Mar.
Neoadjuvant therapy has become the standard of care for locally advanced mid-low rectal cancer. Pathological complete response (pCR) can be achieved in 12%-38% of patients. Patients with pCR have the most favorable long-term outcomes. Intensifying neoadjuvant therapy and extending the interval between termination of neoadjuvant treatment and surgery may increase the pCR rate. Growing evidence has raised the issue of whether local excision or observation rather than radical surgery is an alternative for patients who achieve a clinical complete response after neoadjuvant therapy. Herein, we highlight many of the advances and resultant controversies that are likely to dominate the research agenda for pCR of rectal cancer in the modern era.
新辅助治疗已成为局部晚期中低位直肠癌的标准治疗方法。12% - 38%的患者可实现病理完全缓解(pCR)。达到pCR的患者具有最良好的长期预后。强化新辅助治疗以及延长新辅助治疗结束至手术之间的间隔时间可能会提高pCR率。越来越多的证据提出了一个问题,即对于新辅助治疗后达到临床完全缓解的患者,局部切除或观察而非根治性手术是否可作为一种替代方案。在此,我们重点介绍了许多可能主导现代直肠癌pCR研究议程的进展以及由此引发的争议。