Suppr超能文献

BAL 半乳甘露聚糖检测诊断侵袭性曲霉病的准确性:双变量荟萃分析和系统评价。

Accuracy of BAL galactomannan in diagnosing invasive aspergillosis: a bivariate metaanalysis and systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Respiratory Diseases, Nursing School, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, ROC.

出版信息

Chest. 2010 Oct;138(4):817-24. doi: 10.1378/chest.10-0488. Epub 2010 May 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A serum galactomannan (GM) assay has been approved for diagnosing invasive aspergillosis (IA). However, the role of the BAL-GM assay has not been well established. Therefore, we conducted a metaanalysis to determine the overall accuracy of BAL-GM in the diagnosis of IA.

METHODS

After a systematic review of English-language studies, the sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPE), and positive and negative likelihood ratios (PLR and NLR, respectively) of BAL-GM for the diagnosis of IA were pooled using a bivariate metaanalysis. Hierarchic summary receiver operating characteristic curves were used to summarize overall test performance. Potential between-study heterogeneity was explored by subgroup analyses. We calculated posttest probability to evaluate clinical usefulness.

RESULTS

Twelve reports, including 13 studies, met our inclusion criteria. The summary estimates of the BAL-GM assay for proven or probable IA were as follows: SEN, 0.90 (95% CI, 0.79-0.96); SPE, 0.94 (95% CI, 0.90-0.96); PLR, 14.87 (95% CI, 8.89-24.90); and NLR, 0.10 (95% CI, 0.04-0.24). The four summary estimates of the BAL-GM assay for proven IA were 0.94 (95% CI, 0.86-0.98), 0.79 (95% CI, 0.68-0.86), 4.41 (95% CI, 2.87-6.77), and 0.07 (95% CI, 0.03-0.09), respectively. Significant heterogeneity was present.

CONCLUSIONS

BAL-GM determination is a sensitive and specific test for the diagnosis of proven and probable IA. The measurement of BAL-GM is thus likely to be a useful tool for diagnosing IA. Further studies focused on the impact of treatment agents are needed.

摘要

背景

血清半乳甘露聚糖(GM)检测已被批准用于诊断侵袭性曲霉病(IA)。然而,支气管肺泡灌洗液 GM 检测在诊断中的作用尚未得到充分确立。因此,我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以确定 BAL-GM 检测在诊断 IA 中的总体准确性。

方法

在对英文文献进行系统评价后,使用双变量荟萃分析汇总 BAL-GM 检测对 IA 诊断的敏感性(SEN)、特异性(SPE)以及阳性和阴性似然比(PLR 和 NLR)。使用层次汇总受试者工作特征曲线总结总体检测性能。通过亚组分析探索潜在的研究间异质性。我们计算了 posttest probability 以评估临床实用性。

结果

12 份报告,包含 13 项研究,符合我们的纳入标准。BAL-GM 检测对确诊或拟诊 IA 的汇总估计值如下:SEN,0.90(95%置信区间,0.79-0.96);SPE,0.94(95%置信区间,0.90-0.96);PLR,14.87(95%置信区间,8.89-24.90);NLR,0.10(95%置信区间,0.04-0.24)。BAL-GM 检测对确诊 IA 的四项汇总估计值分别为 0.94(95%置信区间,0.86-0.98)、0.79(95%置信区间,0.68-0.86)、4.41(95%置信区间,2.87-6.77)和 0.07(95%置信区间,0.03-0.09)。存在显著的异质性。

结论

BAL-GM 检测是诊断确诊和拟诊 IA 的一种敏感和特异的检测方法。因此,BAL-GM 检测可能是诊断 IA 的有用工具。需要进一步研究关注治疗药物的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验