Hsieh Hwey-Lian, Fan Lan-Feng, Chen Chang-Po, Wu Jiunn-Tzong, Liu Wen-Cheng
Biodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, 128 Academia Rd., Sec. 2, Nankang, Taipei 115 , Taiwan.
J Plankton Res. 2010 Jun;32(6):829-841. doi: 10.1093/plankt/fbq026. Epub 2010 Mar 17.
We examined how tidal changes and which physical factors affected holo- and meroplankton assemblages in a subtropical estuary in Taiwan in February 1999. A factor analysis showed that during tidal flooding, the water mass properties changed from low salinity (5-16) and high particulate organic carbon (POC, 2.6-4.5 mg L(-1)) content to increasing salinity and high total suspended matter content (29.0-104.5 mg L(-1)). With a receding tide, the water became more saline again, and its velocity increased (from non-detectable to 0.67 m s(-1)). One-way ANOVA showed that the distributions of four dominant taxa were affected by the ebb tide and exhibited two distinct groups. The first group consisted of non-motile invertebrate eggs and weakly swimming polychaete sabellid embryos and larvae (at densities of 1.25-1.40 ind. L(-1)), while the second consisted of better-swimming copepods and polychaete spionid larvae (at densities of 0.70-1.65 ind. L(-1)). A canonical correlation analysis demonstrated that the former group occurred at sites with greater freshwater input, higher POC content and greater depth, whereas the latter group was significantly associated with sites subject to seawater and faster flows. We propose that a two-layered circulation process and tidally induced oscillations in water movements might account for the distributional differences between these two groups.
1999年2月,我们研究了台湾亚热带河口的潮汐变化以及哪些物理因素影响了全浮游生物和部分浮游生物的组合。因子分析表明,在涨潮期间,水体性质从低盐度(5 - 16)和高颗粒有机碳(POC,2.6 - 4.5毫克/升)含量转变为盐度增加和高总悬浮物含量(29.0 - 104.5毫克/升)。随着退潮,水体再次变得更咸,其流速增加(从不可检测到0.67米/秒)。单因素方差分析表明,四个优势类群的分布受退潮影响,并表现出两个不同的组。第一组由非活动的无脊椎动物卵和弱游泳的多毛类沙蚕胚胎及幼虫组成(密度为1.25 - 1.40个/升),而第二组由游泳能力更强的桡足类和多毛类矶沙蚕幼虫组成(密度为0.70 - 1.65个/升)。典型相关分析表明,前一组出现在淡水输入量更大、POC含量更高和深度更大的地点,而后者与受海水影响且水流更快的地点显著相关。我们提出,两层环流过程和潮汐引起的水体运动振荡可能解释了这两组之间的分布差异。