• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在去中心化乳腺癌筛查项目中,数字乳腺 X 光摄影是否会导致与胶片乳腺 X 光摄影可比的筛查性能参数?

Does digital mammography in a decentralized breast cancer screening program lead to screening performance parameters comparable with film-screen mammography?

机构信息

Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Eur Radiol. 2010 Oct;20(10):2307-14. doi: 10.1007/s00330-010-1807-6. Epub 2010 May 9.

DOI:10.1007/s00330-010-1807-6
PMID:20455065
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate if the screening performance parameters of digital mammography (DM) in a decentralized screening organization were comparable with film-screen mammography (FSM).

METHODS

A nationwide screening program was launched in 2001, and since 2005 screening with DM has been allowed. Firstly, the parameters of the three regional screening units (RSUs) that first switched to DM (11,355 women) were compared with the FSM period of the same three RSUs (23,325 women). Secondly, they were compared with the results of the whole central breast unit (CBU).

RESULTS

The recall rate (RR) of the DM group in the initial round was 2.64% [2.40% for FSM (p = 0.43)] and in the subsequent round 1.20% [1.58% for FSM (p = 0.03)]. The cancer detection rate (CDR) was 0.59% for DM and 0.64% for FSM (p = 0.56). The percentage of ductal carcinoma in situ was 0.07% for DM and 0.16% for FSM (p = 0.02). The positive predictive value was high in the subsequent rounds (DM 48.00%, FSM 45.93%) and lower in the initial round (DM 24.05%, FSM 24.86%). Compared with the results of the whole CBU, DM showed no significant difference.

CONCLUSION

DM can be introduced in a decentralized screening organization with a high CDR without increasing the RR.

摘要

目的

评估在分散式筛查组织中数字乳腺 X 线摄影(DM)的筛查性能参数是否与胶片乳腺 X 线摄影(FSM)相当。

方法

2001 年启动了一项全国性的筛查计划,自 2005 年以来允许进行 DM 筛查。首先,比较了三个最先切换到 DM 的区域筛查单位(RSU)(11355 名女性)的参数与这三个 RSU 的 FSM 时期(23325 名女性)。其次,将其与整个中央乳房单位(CBU)的结果进行比较。

结果

DM 组首轮的召回率(RR)为 2.64%[FSM 为 2.40%(p=0.43)],后续轮次为 1.20%[FSM 为 1.58%(p=0.03)]。DM 的癌症检出率(CDR)为 0.59%,FSM 为 0.64%(p=0.56)。DM 的导管原位癌(DCIS)百分比为 0.07%,FSM 为 0.16%(p=0.02)。后续轮次的阳性预测值较高(DM 为 48.00%,FSM 为 45.93%),首轮较低(DM 为 24.05%,FSM 为 24.86%)。与整个 CBU 的结果相比,DM 无显著差异。

结论

在高 CDR 情况下,DM 可在分散式筛查组织中引入,而不会增加 RR。

相似文献

1
Does digital mammography in a decentralized breast cancer screening program lead to screening performance parameters comparable with film-screen mammography?在去中心化乳腺癌筛查项目中,数字乳腺 X 光摄影是否会导致与胶片乳腺 X 光摄影可比的筛查性能参数?
Eur Radiol. 2010 Oct;20(10):2307-14. doi: 10.1007/s00330-010-1807-6. Epub 2010 May 9.
2
Effect of Different Types of Mammography Equipment on Screening Outcomes: A Report by the Alliance for Breast Cancer Screening in Korea.不同类型乳腺摄影设备对筛查结果的影响:韩国乳腺癌筛查联盟报告。
Korean J Radiol. 2019 Dec;20(12):1638-1645. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2019.0006.
3
Does digital mammography increase detection of high-risk breast lesions presenting as calcifications?数字乳腺 X 线摄影是否会增加对表现为钙化的高危乳腺病变的检出率?
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Nov;201(5):1148-54. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.10195.
4
Screening outcome for consecutive examinations with digital breast tomosynthesis versus standard digital mammography in a population-based screening program.基于人群的筛查项目中数字乳腺断层合成摄影与标准数字乳腺钼靶摄影连续检查的筛查结果。
Eur Radiol. 2019 Dec;29(12):6991-6999. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06264-y. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
5
Digital mammography screening: average glandular dose and first performance parameters.数字化乳腺钼靶筛查:平均腺体剂量及首次性能参数
Rofo. 2007 Sep;179(9):892-5. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-963387.
6
Nation-wide data on screening performance during the transition to digital mammography: observations in 6 million screens.全国范围内数字化乳腺摄影过渡期间的筛查性能数据:600 万次筛查的观察结果。
Eur J Cancer. 2013 Nov;49(16):3517-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.06.020. Epub 2013 Jul 17.
7
Comparison of digital screening mammography and screen-film mammography in the early detection of clinically relevant cancers: a multicenter study.数字筛查乳腺 X 线摄影与屏片乳腺 X 线摄影在临床相关癌症早期检测中的比较:一项多中心研究。
Radiology. 2012 Dec;265(3):707-14. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12111461. Epub 2012 Oct 2.
8
Implementation of digital mammography in a population-based breast cancer screening program: effect of screening round on recall rate and cancer detection.在基于人群的乳腺癌筛查项目中实施数字化乳腺摄影:筛查轮次对召回率和癌症检测的影响。
Radiology. 2009 Jul;252(1):31-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2521080696. Epub 2009 May 6.
9
Multimodality screening of high-risk women: a prospective cohort study.多模态筛查高危女性:一项前瞻性队列研究。
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Dec 20;27(36):6124-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.24.4277. Epub 2009 Nov 2.
10
Digital Mammography Has Persistently Increased High-Grade and Overall DCIS Detection Without Altering Upgrade Rate.数字乳腺 X 线摄影术持续提高高级别和总体 DCIS 检出率,而不改变升级率。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021 Apr;216(4):912-918. doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.23314. Epub 2021 Feb 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Full-Field Digital Mammography Versus Film-Screen Mammography in Population Screening: A Meta-Analysis.全数字化乳腺摄影与屏片乳腺摄影在人群筛查中的影响:荟萃分析。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021 Jan 4;113(1):16-26. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djaa080.
2
Screen-detected versus interval cancers: Effect of imaging modality and breast density in the Flemish Breast Cancer Screening Programme.筛查发现的癌症与间期癌:弗拉芒乳腺癌筛查项目中成像方式和乳腺密度的影响。
Eur Radiol. 2017 Sep;27(9):3810-3819. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-4757-4. Epub 2017 Mar 13.
3
Breast cancer detection rates using four different types of mammography detectors.

本文引用的文献

1
Breast cancer screening results 5 years after introduction of digital mammography in a population-based screening program.在一项基于人群的筛查项目中引入数字乳腺摄影5年后的乳腺癌筛查结果。
Radiology. 2009 Nov;253(2):353-8. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2532090225. Epub 2009 Jul 31.
2
Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: comparison within the UK breast screening program and systematic review of published data.全视野数字化乳腺摄影与屏-片乳腺摄影:英国乳腺筛查项目内的比较及已发表数据的系统评价
Radiology. 2009 May;251(2):347-58. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2512081235.
3
Interval cancers in the beginning years of the breast cancer screening programme in the Belgian province of Limburg.
使用四种不同类型的乳腺摄影探测器的乳腺癌检测率。
Eur Radiol. 2016 Mar;26(3):874-83. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3885-y. Epub 2015 Jun 25.
4
Impact of the digitalisation of mammography on performance parameters and breast dose in the Flemish Breast Cancer Screening Programme.乳腺钼靶数字化对弗拉芒乳腺癌筛查计划中性能参数和乳腺剂量的影响。
Eur Radiol. 2014 Aug;24(8):1808-19. doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3169-y. Epub 2014 May 10.
5
Technical and clinical breast cancer screening performance indicators for computed radiography versus direct digital radiography.计算机放射摄影与直接数字放射摄影的技术和临床乳腺癌筛查性能指标。
Eur Radiol. 2013 Oct;23(10):2891-8. doi: 10.1007/s00330-013-2876-0. Epub 2013 May 21.
6
Bilateral contrast-enhanced dual-energy digital mammography: feasibility and comparison with conventional digital mammography and MR imaging in women with known breast carcinoma.双侧对比增强双能数字乳腺摄影:在已知患有乳腺癌的女性中与常规数字乳腺摄影和磁共振成像的可行性比较。
Radiology. 2013 Mar;266(3):743-51. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12121084. Epub 2012 Dec 6.
Acta Clin Belg. 2008 May-Jun;63(3):179-84. doi: 10.1179/acb.2008.028.
4
Typetesting of physical characteristics of digital mammography systems for screening within the Flemish breast cancer screening programme.在弗拉芒乳腺癌筛查项目中用于筛查的数字乳腺摄影系统物理特性的型式试验。
Eur J Radiol. 2009 Jun;70(3):539-48. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.01.046. Epub 2008 Apr 18.
5
Teaching syllabus for radiological aspects of breast cancer screening with digital mammography.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2008;129(1-3):191-4. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncn022. Epub 2008 Feb 29.
6
European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. Fourth edition--summary document.欧洲乳腺癌筛查与诊断质量保证指南。第四版——总结文件。
Ann Oncol. 2008 Apr;19(4):614-22. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdm481. Epub 2007 Nov 17.
7
Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: comparative accuracy in concurrent screening cohorts.全视野数字化乳腺摄影与屏-片乳腺摄影:同期筛查队列中的比较准确性
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Oct;189(4):860-6. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.2303.
8
Preliminary validation of a new variable pattern for daily quality assurance of medical image display devices.一种新的变量模式用于医疗图像显示设备日常质量保证的初步验证。
Med Phys. 2007 Jul;34(7):2744-58. doi: 10.1118/1.2742502.
9
Full-field digital mammography compared to screen film mammography in the prevalent round of a population-based screening programme: the Vestfold County Study.在一项基于人群的筛查项目的现患轮次中,全视野数字乳腺摄影与屏-片乳腺摄影的比较:韦斯特福尔郡研究
Eur Radiol. 2008 Jan;18(1):183-91. doi: 10.1007/s00330-007-0730-y. Epub 2007 Aug 7.
10
Image quality measurements and metrics in full field digital mammography: an overview.全视野数字乳腺摄影中的图像质量测量与指标:综述
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005;117(1-3):120-30. doi: 10.1093/rpd/nci711. Epub 2006 Feb 3.