Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Popul Health Manag. 2010 Aug;13(4):209-18. doi: 10.1089/pop.2009.0046.
The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to examine the impact of the type of health plan (capitated vs. fee for service [FFS]) on outcomes (medication adherence and health care service utilization) in type 2 diabetes Medicaid enrollees. Subjects were 8581 Medicaid enrollees with type 2 diabetes who newly started oral pharmacotherapy and were followed for 6 months before and 12 months after the index antidiabetic medication to collect data on medication adherence and health care service utilization. Multiple log-linear regression analysis was used to predict medication adherence while negative binomial regressions were used to examine health care service utilization. Medication adherence was found to be significantly lower for patients in capitated plans (5%, P < 0.05). Moreover, patients in capitated plans were associated with 14% more hospitalizations and 16% increased odds of emergency room visits, but 27% fewer outpatient visits compared to those in FFS plans (all P < 0.05). Although Medicaid programs use capitated managed care plans primarily as a cost-containment strategy, these plans may not be cost-effective for the long-term management of chronic conditions such as diabetes.
本回顾性队列研究旨在探讨健康计划类型(按人头付费与按服务收费)对 2 型糖尿病 Medicaid 参保者结局(药物依从性和医疗服务利用)的影响。研究对象为 8581 名新开始口服药物治疗的 2 型糖尿病 Medicaid 参保者,在索引抗糖尿病药物之前和之后的 6 个月和 12 个月收集药物依从性和医疗服务利用的数据。采用多项对数线性回归分析预测药物依从性,采用负二项回归检验医疗服务利用。结果发现,按人头付费计划的患者药物依从性显著较低(5%,P<0.05)。此外,与按服务收费计划相比,按人头付费计划的患者住院率增加 14%,急诊就诊率增加 16%,但门诊就诊率降低 27%(均 P<0.05)。尽管 Medicaid 计划主要将按人头付费的管理式医疗计划作为一种成本控制策略,但这些计划对于糖尿病等慢性病的长期管理可能并不具有成本效益。