Department of Medicine, Huron Hospital, Cleveland Clinic Hospital, Cleveland, OH 44112, USA.
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2010 Apr;35(2):195-200. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2710.2009.01073.x.
Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) affects 5-10 million adults annually in the United States with approximately 1.1 million hospitalizations. Current guidelines recommend fluoroquinolones as monotherapy for treatment of CAP in general medical wards and doxycycline monotherapy for outpatient therapy only. Fluoroquinolones are expensive and development of bacterial resistance to them has become a concern. Therefore, we studied whether doxycycline is as efficacious as levofloxacin in treatment of CAP in general medical wards.
In this prospective double-blinded trial, non-pregnant adults with clinical and radiological evidence of pneumonia requiring hospitalization were enrolled. Patients who were septic, hypoxic requiring intubations, nursing home residents, diagnosed with severe hepatic or renal dysfunction, recently hospitalized or immunocompromised were excluded from the study. Subjects were randomly assigned to either i.v. levofloxacin 500 mg daily or doxycycline 100 mg twice daily. After discharge, patients were followed for 2 months.
There were 30 patients in the levofloxacin group and 35 patients in the doxycycline group. Groups were comparable in both clinical and laboratory profiles. Additionally, efficacy of treatment was not significantly different between the two groups (P = 0.844). Length of stay was 5.7 +/- 2.05 days in the levofloxacin group and 4.0 +/- 1.82 days in the doxycycline group (P < 0.0012). Failure rate was similar in both groups (P = 0.893). Total antibiotic cost was $122.07 +/- 15.84 for levofloxacin and $64.98 +/- 24.4 for doxycycline (P < 0.0001).
Our study supports doxycycline as an effective and economical alternative therapy for levofloxacin in the empirical treatment of CAP in general medical wards.
在美国,社区获得性肺炎(CAP)每年影响 500 万至 1000 万成年人,其中约有 110 万人需要住院治疗。目前的指南建议氟喹诺酮类药物作为一般医疗病房治疗 CAP 的单一疗法,而强力霉素单一疗法仅适用于门诊治疗。氟喹诺酮类药物价格昂贵,且细菌对其产生耐药性已成为一个问题。因此,我们研究了强力霉素在一般医疗病房治疗 CAP 的疗效是否与左氧氟沙星相当。
在这项前瞻性、双盲试验中,我们招募了有临床和影像学证据表明需要住院治疗的肺炎的非妊娠成年人。排除了败血症、需要插管的缺氧、疗养院居民、诊断为严重肝或肾功能障碍、最近住院或免疫功能低下的患者。受试者被随机分配接受静脉注射左氧氟沙星 500mg 每日一次或强力霉素 100mg 每日两次。出院后,对患者进行了为期 2 个月的随访。
左氧氟沙星组有 30 例患者,强力霉素组有 35 例患者。两组在临床和实验室特征方面无显著差异。此外,两组的治疗效果无显著差异(P = 0.844)。左氧氟沙星组的住院时间为 5.7 +/- 2.05 天,强力霉素组为 4.0 +/- 1.82 天(P < 0.0012)。两组的失败率相似(P = 0.893)。左氧氟沙星的总抗生素费用为 122.07 +/- 15.84 美元,强力霉素为 64.98 +/- 24.4 美元(P < 0.0001)。
我们的研究支持强力霉素作为左氧氟沙星在一般医疗病房经验性治疗 CAP 的有效且经济的替代疗法。