• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

莫西沙星单药治疗对社区获得性肺炎住院患者有效:MOTIV研究——一项随机临床试验

Moxifloxacin monotherapy is effective in hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia: the MOTIV study--a randomized clinical trial.

作者信息

Torres Antoni, Garau Javier, Arvis Pierre, Carlet Jean, Choudhri Shurjeel, Kureishi Amar, Le Berre Marie-Aude, Lode Hartmut, Winter John, Read Robert C

机构信息

Servei de Pneumologia i Allèrgia Respiratòria, Institut Clinic del Torax, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Clin Infect Dis. 2008 May 15;46(10):1499-509. doi: 10.1086/587519.

DOI:10.1086/587519
PMID:18419482
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to show that sequential intravenous and oral moxifloxacin monotherapy (400 mg once per day) is as efficacious and safe as a combination regimen (intravenous ceftriaxone, 2 g once per day, plus sequential intravenous and oral levofloxacin, 500 mg twice per day) in patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind noninferiority trial. Patients with a Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI) of III-V were stratified on the basis of PSI risk class before randomization. The primary efficacy end point was clinical response at test of cure (4-14 days after the completion of treatment). Secondary efficacy end points were clinical and bacteriological response at end of treatment (days 7-14) and at follow-up assessment (21-28 days after the end of treatment), overall mortality, and mortality attributable to pneumonia.

RESULTS

Seven hundred thirty-three patients were enrolled in the study (368 in the moxifloxacin arm and 365 in the comparator arm); 49% had a PSI of IV, and 10% had a PSI of V. Of 569 patients (291 in the moxifloxacin arm and 278 in the comparator arm) valid for per-protocol analysis, the overall clinical cure rates at test of cure were 86.9% for moxifloxacin and 89.9% for the comparator regimen (95% confidence interval, -8.1% to 2.2%). Bacteriological success at test of cure was 83.3% for moxifloxacin and 85.1% for the comparator regimen (95% confidence interval, -15.4% to 11.8%). There were no significant differences between moxifloxacin and comparator treatments in the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events or in mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Monotherapy with sequential intravenous/oral moxifloxacin was noninferior to treatment with ceftriaxone plus levofloxacin combination therapy in patients with community-acquired pneumonia who required hospitalization.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在表明,对于因社区获得性肺炎住院的患者,序贯静脉及口服莫西沙星单药治疗(每日一次,每次400mg)与联合治疗方案(静脉注射头孢曲松,每日一次,每次2g,加序贯静脉及口服左氧氟沙星,每日两次,每次500mg)同样有效且安全。

方法

我们进行了一项前瞻性、多中心、随机、双盲非劣效性试验。肺炎严重指数(PSI)为III - V级的患者在随机分组前根据PSI风险等级进行分层。主要疗效终点为治疗结束后4 - 14天的治愈试验时的临床反应。次要疗效终点为治疗结束时(第7 - 14天)和随访评估时(治疗结束后21 - 28天)的临床及细菌学反应、总死亡率以及肺炎所致死亡率。

结果

733例患者纳入研究(莫西沙星组368例,对照方案组365例);49%的患者PSI为IV级,10%的患者PSI为V级。在569例符合方案分析标准的患者中(莫西沙星组291例,对照方案组278例),莫西沙星组在治愈试验时的总体临床治愈率为86.9%,对照方案组为89.9%(95%置信区间,-8.1%至2.2%)。莫西沙星组在治愈试验时的细菌学成功率为83.3%,对照方案组为85.1%(95%置信区间,-15.4%至11.8%)。莫西沙星组与对照方案组在治疗期间出现的不良事件发生率或死亡率方面无显著差异。

结论

对于需要住院治疗的社区获得性肺炎患者,序贯静脉/口服莫西沙星单药治疗不劣于头孢曲松加左氧氟沙星联合治疗。

相似文献

1
Moxifloxacin monotherapy is effective in hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia: the MOTIV study--a randomized clinical trial.莫西沙星单药治疗对社区获得性肺炎住院患者有效:MOTIV研究——一项随机临床试验
Clin Infect Dis. 2008 May 15;46(10):1499-509. doi: 10.1086/587519.
2
Community-Acquired Pneumonia Recovery in the Elderly (CAPRIE): efficacy and safety of moxifloxacin therapy versus that of levofloxacin therapy.老年人社区获得性肺炎康复研究(CAPRIE):莫西沙星治疗与左氧氟沙星治疗的疗效及安全性比较
Clin Infect Dis. 2006 Jan 1;42(1):73-81. doi: 10.1086/498520. Epub 2005 Nov 22.
3
Moxifloxacin is non-inferior to combination therapy with ceftriaxone plus metronidazole in patients with community-origin complicated intra-abdominal infections.对于社区获得性复杂性腹腔内感染患者,莫西沙星不劣于头孢曲松联合甲硝唑的联合治疗。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2009 Nov;34(5):439-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2009.06.022. Epub 2009 Aug 18.
4
A comparison of levofloxacin and moxifloxacin use in hospitalized community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) patients in the US: focus on length of stay.美国住院社区获得性肺炎(CAP)患者使用左氧氟沙星和莫西沙星的比较:以住院时间为重点。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2008 Mar;24(3):895-906. doi: 10.1185/030079908X273408.
5
Safety and efficacy of sequential i.v. to p.o. moxifloxacin versus conventional combination therapies for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in patients requiring initial i.v. therapy.对于需要初始静脉治疗的社区获得性肺炎患者,静脉注射序贯至口服莫西沙星与传统联合疗法的安全性和有效性。
J Emerg Med. 2004 Nov;27(4):395-405. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2004.02.023.
6
Treatment with sequential intravenous or oral moxifloxacin was associated with faster clinical improvement than was standard therapy for hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia who received initial parenteral therapy.对于接受初始肠外治疗的社区获得性肺炎住院患者,序贯静脉或口服莫西沙星治疗比标准治疗临床改善更快。
Clin Infect Dis. 2005 Dec 15;41(12):1697-705. doi: 10.1086/498149. Epub 2005 Nov 10.
7
Comparative study of levofloxacin in the treatment of children with community-acquired pneumonia.左氧氟沙星治疗儿童社区获得性肺炎的对比研究。
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2007 Oct;26(10):868-78. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e3180cbd2c7.
8
Levofloxacin versus ceftriaxone plus clarithromycin in the treatment of adults with community-acquired pneumonia requiring hospitalization.左氧氟沙星与头孢曲松联合克拉霉素治疗需要住院的成人社区获得性肺炎的疗效比较
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2005 Jan;25(1):75-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2004.07.013.
9
Treating diabetic foot infections with sequential intravenous to oral moxifloxacin compared with piperacillin-tazobactam/amoxicillin-clavulanate.与哌拉西林-他唑巴坦/阿莫西林-克拉维酸相比,序贯静脉注射至口服莫西沙星治疗糖尿病足感染。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007 Aug;60(2):370-6. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkm130. Epub 2007 Jun 6.
10
Levofloxacin 750-mg for 5 days for the treatment of hospitalized Fine Risk Class III/IV community-acquired pneumonia patients.左氧氟沙星750毫克,疗程5天,用于治疗住院的低死亡风险Ⅲ/Ⅳ级社区获得性肺炎患者。
Respir Med. 2006 Dec;100(12):2129-36. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2006.03.019. Epub 2006 May 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Comprehensive clinical evaluation of moxifloxacin: A retrospective study.莫西沙星的综合临床评估:回顾性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Jun 2;102(22):e33896. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000033896.
2
Appropriateness of antimicrobial selection for treatment of pneumonia in selected public hospitals of Eastern Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study.埃塞俄比亚东部部分公立医院治疗肺炎的抗菌药物选择合理性:一项横断面研究。
SAGE Open Med. 2023 Apr 13;11:20503121231163792. doi: 10.1177/20503121231163792. eCollection 2023.
3
Economic Evaluation of Nemonoxacin, Moxifloxacin and Levofloxacin in the Treatment of Early Community-Acquired Pneumonia with Possible Pulmonary Tuberculosis.
奈诺沙星、莫西沙星和左氧氟沙星治疗可能合并肺结核的早期社区获得性肺炎的经济学评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 15;19(8):4816. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19084816.
4
Data in Brief of: Clinical benefits of moxifloxacin as initial treatment of community-acquired pneumonia: Data from meta-analyses.莫西沙星作为社区获得性肺炎初始治疗的临床益处:来自荟萃分析的数据简报
Data Brief. 2021 Sep 14;38:107352. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2021.107352. eCollection 2021 Oct.
5
Comparing Several Treatments with Antibiotics for Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.比较几种治疗方法与抗生素治疗社区获得性肺炎的疗效:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Iran J Public Health. 2021 Jun;50(6):1108-1119. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v50i6.6410.
6
Comparison of ceftriaxone plus macrolide and ampicillin/sulbactam plus macrolide in treatment for patients with community-acquired pneumonia without risk factors for aspiration: an open-label, quasi-randomized, controlled trial.头孢曲松联合大环内酯类药物与氨苄西林/舒巴坦联合大环内酯类药物治疗无吸入风险因素的社区获得性肺炎患者的比较:一项开放标签、拟随机、对照试验。
BMC Pulm Med. 2020 Jun 5;20(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s12890-020-01198-4.
7
Guideline for Antibiotic Use in Adults with Community-acquired Pneumonia.成人社区获得性肺炎抗生素使用指南
Infect Chemother. 2018 Jun;50(2):160-198. doi: 10.3947/ic.2018.50.2.160.
8
Moxifloxacin monotherapy versus combination therapy in patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia evoked ARDS.莫西沙星单药治疗与联合治疗对重症社区获得性肺炎并发急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的疗效比较
BMC Anesthesiol. 2017 Jun 14;17(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12871-017-0376-5.
9
JAID/JSC Guidelines for the Treatment of Respiratory Infectious Diseases: The Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases/Japanese Society of Chemotherapy - The JAID/JSC Guide to Clinical Management of Infectious Disease/Guideline-preparing Committee Respiratory Infectious Disease WG.日本传染病学会/日本化疗学会《呼吸道传染病治疗指南》:日本传染病学会/日本化疗学会传染病临床管理指南/指南编写委员会呼吸道传染病工作组
J Infect Chemother. 2016 Jul;22(7 Suppl):S1-S65. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2015.12.019. Epub 2016 Jun 15.
10
Pharmacokinetics of consecutive oral moxifloxacin (400 mg/day) in patients with respiratory tract infection.呼吸道感染患者连续口服莫西沙星(400毫克/天)的药代动力学。
Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2016 Feb;10(1):34-42. doi: 10.1177/1753465815620338. Epub 2015 Dec 11.