Broward County Sheriff's Office, DNA Unit, 201 SE 6th Street, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301, USA.
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2011 Jun;5(3):185-93. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2010.03.002. Epub 2010 Apr 24.
The goal of this paper was to examine and compare two different commercially available approaches to the determination of the relative quantities of autosomal and Y chromosomal DNA using real-time PCR. One, Quantifiler(®) Duo, utilizes a TaqMan(®) assay with single copy probes for both autosomal human and Y quantification. The other method, Plexor HY(®) utilizes a primer quenching assay with multi-copy probes for its quantification of autosomal human and Y chromosomal DNA. To test these approaches we have utilized the NIST Human DNA Quantitation Standard Reference Material 2372, a set of three different NIST human DNA quantification standards, to examine the precision, accuracy and sensitivity of the real-time PCR assays. We also examined data from both systems utilizing casework samples. The results show that both systems produced linear estimates for DNA quantity over a broad range of input DNA. However we did observe some apparent copy number effects when comparing the three different NIST standards which we attributed to issues with sequence variations in the different standards. Overall, the single copy approach provided better accuracy while the multi-copy approach produced better sensitivity. Thus the choice of which system to use should depend upon the goals of the user.
本文旨在研究和比较两种不同的实时 PCR 方法,以检测和比较两种不同的商业化方法,用于确定常染色体和 Y 染色体 DNA 的相对数量。一种方法是 Quantifiler(®) Duo,它使用 TaqMan(®)测定法,对常染色体和 Y 进行定量的单拷贝探针。另一种方法是 Plexor HY(®),它使用引物淬灭测定法,对常染色体和 Y 染色体 DNA 进行定量的多拷贝探针。为了测试这些方法,我们使用了 NIST 人类 DNA 定量标准参考物质 2372,这是一套三个不同的 NIST 人类 DNA 定量标准,以检查实时 PCR 测定的精度、准确性和灵敏度。我们还检查了两个系统利用案例样本的数据。结果表明,两个系统在广泛的输入 DNA 范围内都产生了线性估计的 DNA 数量。然而,当我们比较三个不同的 NIST 标准时,我们确实观察到了一些明显的拷贝数效应,我们将其归因于不同标准中的序列变异问题。总的来说,单拷贝方法提供了更好的准确性,而多拷贝方法则产生了更好的灵敏度。因此,应该根据用户的目标来选择使用哪个系统。