三年级与四年级神经科实习学生的态度与表现
Attitudes and performance of third- vs fourth-year neurology clerkship students.
作者信息
Dewey Richard B, Agostini Mark
机构信息
Department of Neurology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, TX 75390-9036, USA.
出版信息
Arch Neurol. 2010 May;67(5):548-51. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2010.64.
OBJECTIVE
To compare student performance, attitudes, and career plans based on whether the neurology clerkship was taken in the third or fourth year.
DESIGN
During the 1-year transition when the neurology clerkship was officially moved from the fourth to the third year at our institution, students took the identical clinical clerkship and were mixed together at each clinical site where faculty were blinded to student's year.
SETTING
University of Texas Southwestern Medical School.
PARTICIPANTS
Third- and fourth-year medical students.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
Performance, enthusiasm, and match results were analyzed by year of medical school for differences.
RESULTS
There was a statistical trend toward better performance of third-year students as measured by the clinical evaluation grade (88.4 vs 87.4; P = .051) but this represented only a 1% difference. No difference was noted on the National Board of Medical Examiners neurology shelf examination score (73.8 vs 74.9; P = .20). Students' enthusiasm for neurologic learning was significantly higher in third- as compared with fourth-year students (P = .004). The probability that students would choose a career in neurology was higher for third- than fourth-year students (P < .001), but there was no correlation between year and matching for a neurology residency (P = .17).
CONCLUSIONS
Our findings support the belief among academic neurologists that students who take the neurology clerkship in the third year have greater enthusiasm for the field and look more favorably on neurology as a possible career than those taking the neurology clerkship in their fourth year. Nevertheless, our findings do not support the notion that third-year placement results in superior achievement.
目的
根据神经科实习安排在三年级还是四年级,比较学生的成绩、态度和职业规划。
设计
在我校神经科实习正式从四年级调整到三年级的1年过渡期间,学生们参加相同的临床实习,在每个临床地点混合编组,教员对学生所在年级不知情。
地点
德克萨斯大学西南医学中心。
参与者
三年级和四年级医学生。
主要观察指标
按医学院年级分析成绩、热情和匹配结果的差异。
结果
根据临床评估成绩衡量,三年级学生成绩有更好表现的统计学趋势(88.4对87.4;P = 0.051),但这仅代表1%的差异。美国医学考试委员会神经科结业考试成绩无差异(73.8对74.9;P = 0.20)。与四年级学生相比,三年级学生对神经学学习的热情显著更高(P = 0.004)。三年级学生选择神经科职业的可能性高于四年级学生(P < 0.001),但年级与匹配神经科住院医师培训之间无相关性(P = 0.17)。
结论
我们的研究结果支持学术神经科医生的观点,即三年级参加神经科实习的学生比四年级参加实习的学生对该领域有更高的热情,并且更看好神经科作为一种可能的职业。然而,我们的研究结果不支持三年级实习安排会带来更优异成绩的观点。