Suppr超能文献

三站式急性腹痛客观结构化临床考试中的鉴别诊断:对三年级医学生表现的需求评估和外科学实习中的总结性评估。

Differential diagnosis in a 3-station acute abdominal pain objective structured clinical examination (OSCE): a needs assessment in third-year medical student performance and summative evaluation in the surgical clerkship.

机构信息

University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA.

出版信息

J Surg Educ. 2011 Jul-Aug;68(4):266-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2011.02.012. Epub 2011 Apr 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is poor interrater reliability in the assessment of a medical student's ability to generate a differential diagnosis list using Likert-based scales in the surgical clerkship. This important clinical skill is tested on the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 2 Clinical Skills Examination.

OBJECTIVE

We hypothesize that third-year medical students in the surgical clerkship will be able to accurately diagnose adult patients with acute abdominal pain after performing a focused history and physical examination in a 3-station Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE). Second, we want to test our hypothesis that service assessments of a student's ability to analyze data will not correspond with OSCE performance.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, third-year medical student differential diagnosis lists from a 3-station OSCE and medical student clerkship assessments were collected from the 2009-2010 academic year. Differential diagnosis lists were scored for accuracy. Differences between groups were compared with nonparametric statistics, using an α = 0.05.

RESULTS

Seventy-eight third-year medical students (56.4% female) were evaluated. For 2 stations, more than half of the medical students had the correct diagnosis on the differential diagnosis list (p < 0.0001). For 1 station, less than half of the medical students had the correct diagnosis on the differential diagnosis list (p = 0.0001). There were no differences in the service evaluation scores and the number of correct differential diagnosis lists for the students (p = 0.91).

CONCLUSIONS

Third-year medical students are generally accurate with the ability to diagnosis adult patients with acute abdominal pain after performing a history and physical examination. Additionally, surgical service faculty and resident assessments of a student's ability to analyze data do not correspond with OSCE performance. We recommend some changes that might lead to improved grading for third-year medical students in the surgical clerkship.

摘要

背景

在外科实习中,使用基于李克特量表的评分来评估医学生生成鉴别诊断列表的能力,其评分者间信度较差。这一重要的临床技能在美国医师执照考试(USMLE)第二步临床技能考试中进行测试。

目的

我们假设,在 3 站式客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)中,进行重点病史采集和体格检查后,外科实习的三年级医学生会准确诊断出患有急性腹痛的成年患者。其次,我们希望验证假设,即学生数据分析能力的服务评估与 OSCE 表现并不相关。

方法

在这项回顾性研究中,我们从 2009-2010 学年收集了 3 站式 OSCE 和医学生实习评估中的三年级医学生鉴别诊断列表。对鉴别诊断列表的准确性进行评分。使用非参数统计比较组间差异,α 值设定为 0.05。

结果

共评估了 78 名三年级医学生(56.4%为女性)。对于 2 个站点,超过一半的医学生在鉴别诊断列表上有正确的诊断(p < 0.0001)。对于 1 个站点,不到一半的医学生在鉴别诊断列表上有正确的诊断(p = 0.0001)。学生的服务评估分数和正确鉴别诊断列表的数量之间没有差异(p = 0.91)。

结论

三年级医学生在进行病史采集和体格检查后,通常能够准确诊断出患有急性腹痛的成年患者。此外,外科服务教师和住院医师对学生数据分析能力的评估与 OSCE 表现不相关。我们建议进行一些改变,以提高外科实习中三年级医学生的评分。

相似文献

7
Development, impact, and measurement of enhanced physical diagnosis skills.增强体格检查技能的发展、影响和评估。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2009 Oct;14(4):547-56. doi: 10.1007/s10459-008-9137-z. Epub 2008 Oct 22.

引用本文的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验