Arena J G, Hannah S L, Bruno G M, Smith J D, Meador K J
Psychology Service, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Augusta, GA 30910.
J Psychosom Res. 1991;35(2-3):187-95. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(91)90073-w.
This paper presents the results of two studies. In the first, 20 tension headache subjects were evaluated in both a headache and non-headache state on bilateral trapezius and unilateral frontalis electromyographic activity during six positions: standing, bending from the waist, rising, sitting with back unsupported, sitting with back supported, and prone. Results indicated no effect of headache state on either measure. In a second study, 11 of the tension headache sufferers in Study One and 11 age-matched controls were compared on the same measures (controls were assessed two times, with a one-week duration separating evaluations). Results indicated a diagnosis by position interaction, with post-hoc tests revealing the muscle activity of tension headache sufferers to be considerably higher during the prone position than that of non-headache controls. Non-significant trends were found when examining the data for clinically significant abnormalities (90% of the headache sufferers were found to have significant clinical abnormalities).
本文介绍了两项研究的结果。在第一项研究中,对20名紧张性头痛患者在头痛和非头痛状态下,于站立、弯腰、起身、无支撑坐姿、有支撑坐姿和俯卧六种姿势下的双侧斜方肌和单侧额肌肌电活动进行了评估。结果表明,头痛状态对任何一项测量指标均无影响。在第二项研究中,对第一项研究中的11名紧张性头痛患者和11名年龄匹配的对照组进行了相同指标的比较(对照组评估了两次,两次评估间隔一周)。结果表明存在姿势与诊断的交互作用,事后检验显示,紧张性头痛患者在俯卧姿势下的肌肉活动明显高于非头痛对照组。在检查具有临床显著异常的数据时发现了不显著的趋势(90%的头痛患者被发现有显著的临床异常)。