Suppr超能文献

下背痛受试者和非疼痛对照组在六个不同体位下的肌电图记录:疼痛程度的影响

Electromyographic recordings of low back pain subjects and non-pain controls in six different positions: effect of pain levels.

作者信息

Arena John G, Sherman Richard A, Bruno Glenda M, Young Timothy R

机构信息

Veterans Affairs Medical Center, and Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GAU.S.A. Fitzsimons Army Medical Center, Aurora, COU.S.A.

出版信息

Pain. 1991 Apr;45(1):23-28. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(91)90160-Y.

Abstract

Surface electromyographic (EMG) activity recordings of bilateral paraspinal muscle tension were measured twice on 20 non-pain controls and on 46 low back pain subjects (21 individuals with intervertebral disk disorders and 25 subjects with unspecified musculoskeletal backache) during 6 positions: standing, bending from the waist, rising, sitting with back unsupported, sitting with back supported, and prone. Back pain subjects were measured during both low pain and high pain states. Results revealed a non-significant trend for all subjects, regardless of diagnosis, to have higher paraspinal muscle tension levels on the second (or high pain) assessment. A significant diagnosis by position interaction was observed which was similar to the interaction in our previous study which employed only a single measurement session. Analysis of simple main effects revealed this to be due to control subjects during the standing position having lower EMG levels than the back pain groups, and intervertebral disk disorder subjects having higher EMG levels than the other groups during the supported sitting position. As in our previous study, diagnosis was found to be a clinically significant factor, in that controls had much fewer clinically abnormal readings than back pain patients. The lack of a significant effect for pain state is congruent with findings in the headache literature. The importance of clearly defined diagnostic categories in low back pain research and the utility of measuring subjects in various positions is discussed, as are possible explanations for lack of significant pain state findings.

摘要

在20名无疼痛对照组以及46名腰痛受试者(21名患有椎间盘疾病的个体和25名患有未明确的肌肉骨骼性背痛的受试者)中,在6种姿势下对双侧椎旁肌张力进行了两次表面肌电图(EMG)活动记录,这6种姿势分别为:站立、弯腰、起身、无支撑坐姿、有支撑坐姿和俯卧位。对背痛受试者在低疼痛状态和高疼痛状态下均进行了测量。结果显示,无论诊断如何,所有受试者在第二次(或高疼痛)评估时椎旁肌张力水平均有不显著的升高趋势。观察到显著的诊断与姿势交互作用,这与我们之前仅采用单次测量会话的研究中的交互作用相似。简单主效应分析表明,这是由于站立位时对照组的肌电图水平低于背痛组,以及有支撑坐姿时椎间盘疾病受试者的肌电图水平高于其他组。与我们之前的研究一样,发现诊断是一个具有临床意义的因素,因为对照组的临床异常读数比背痛患者少得多。疼痛状态缺乏显著影响与头痛文献中的发现一致。讨论了在腰痛研究中明确定义诊断类别的重要性以及在不同姿势下测量受试者的效用,以及缺乏显著疼痛状态发现的可能解释。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验