• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

巴雷特食管低级别上皮内瘤变:过度诊断和低估。

Low-grade dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus: overdiagnosed and underestimated.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9 , Amsterdam 1105 AZ , The Netherlands.

出版信息

Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 Jul;105(7):1523-30. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2010.171. Epub 2010 May 11.

DOI:10.1038/ajg.2010.171
PMID:20461069
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Published data on the natural history of low-grade dysplasia (LGD) in Barrett's esophagus (BE) are inconsistent and difficult to interpret. We investigated the natural history of LGD in a large community-based cohort of BE patients after reviewing the original histological diagnosis by an expert panel of pathologists.

METHODS

Histopathology reports of all patients diagnosed with LGD between 2000 and 2006 in six non-university hospitals were reviewed by two expert pathologists. This panel diagnosis was subsequently compared with the histological outcome during prospective endoscopic follow-up.

RESULTS

A diagnosis of LGD was made in 147 patients. After pathology review, 85% of the patients were downstaged to non-dysplastic BE (NDBE) or to indefinite for dysplasia. In only 15% of the patients was the initial diagnosis LGD. Endoscopic follow-up was carried out in 83.6% of patients, with a mean follow-up of 51.1 months. For patients with a consensus diagnosis of LGD, the cumulative risk of progressing to high-grade dysplasia or carcinoma (HGD or Ca) was 85.0% in 109.1 months compared with 4.6% in 107.4 months for patients downstaged to NDBE (P<0.0001). The incidence rate of HGD or Ca was 13.4% per patient per year for patients in whom the diagnosis of LGD was confirmed. For patients downstaged to NDBE, the corresponding incidence rate was 0.49%.

CONCLUSIONS

LGD in BE is an overdiagnosed and yet underestimated entity in general practice. Patients diagnosed with LGD should undergo an expert pathology review to purify this group. In case the diagnosis of LGD is confirmed, patients should undergo strict endoscopic follow-up or should be considered for endoscopic ablation therapy.

摘要

目的

巴雷特食管(BE)低级别上皮内瘤变(LGD)的自然病史相关数据存在差异且难以解读。本研究通过对一组专家病理学家对原始组织学诊断进行回顾,对大型社区 BE 患者队列中的 LGD 自然病史进行了研究。

方法

对 2000 年至 2006 年期间六家非大学医院诊断为 LGD 的所有患者的组织病理学报告进行回顾,由两位专家病理学家进行审查。该小组的诊断随后与前瞻性内镜随访期间的组织学结果进行比较。

结果

147 例患者被诊断为 LGD。在病理学复查后,85%的患者降期为非异型增生性 BE(NDBE)或异型增生不确定。仅 15%的患者最初诊断为 LGD。83.6%的患者接受了内镜随访,平均随访时间为 51.1 个月。对于共识诊断为 LGD 的患者,在 109.1 个月时进展为高级别异型增生或癌(HGD 或 Ca)的累积风险为 85.0%,而降级为 NDBE 的患者为 107.4 个月时为 4.6%(P<0.0001)。对于诊断为 LGD 的患者,每年每例患者的 HGD 或 Ca 发生率为 13.4%。对于降级为 NDBE 的患者,相应的发生率为 0.49%。

结论

BE 中的 LGD 在一般实践中是一种被过度诊断且被低估的病变。诊断为 LGD 的患者应进行专家病理学审查以纯化该组患者。如果确认诊断为 LGD,则患者应进行严格的内镜随访或考虑内镜消融治疗。

相似文献

1
Low-grade dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus: overdiagnosed and underestimated.巴雷特食管低级别上皮内瘤变:过度诊断和低估。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 Jul;105(7):1523-30. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2010.171. Epub 2010 May 11.
2
Dysplasia and risk of further neoplastic progression in a regional Veterans Administration Barrett's cohort.一个地区退伍军人管理局巴雷特食管队列中的发育异常及进一步肿瘤进展风险
Am J Gastroenterol. 2005 Apr;100(4):775-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.41300.x.
3
Surveillance and follow-up strategies in patients with high-grade dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus: a Dutch population-based study.巴雷特食管高级别异型增生患者的监测和随访策略:一项荷兰基于人群的研究。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2012 Apr;107(4):534-42. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2011.459. Epub 2012 Jan 24.
4
Risk factors for progression of low-grade dysplasia in patients with Barrett's esophagus.巴雷特食管患者低级别上皮内瘤变进展的危险因素。
Gastroenterology. 2011 Oct;141(4):1179-86, 1186.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.06.055. Epub 2011 Jun 30.
5
Advanced pathology under squamous epithelium on initial EMR specimens in patients with Barrett's esophagus and high-grade dysplasia or intramucosal carcinoma: implications for surveillance and endotherapy management.巴雷特食管合并高级别异型增生或黏膜内癌患者初次内镜黏膜切除术标本中鳞状上皮下的高级病理学表现:对监测和内镜治疗管理的意义
Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Sep;70(3):417-21. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.01.047. Epub 2009 Jun 24.
6
The diagnosis of low-grade dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus and its implications for disease progression.巴雷特食管低度发育异常的诊断及其对疾病进展的影响。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2000 Dec;95(12):3383-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.03348.x.
7
Long-term endoscopic surveillance of patients with Barrett's esophagus. Incidence of dysplasia and adenocarcinoma: a prospective study.巴雷特食管患者的长期内镜监测。发育异常和腺癌的发病率:一项前瞻性研究。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2003 Sep;98(9):1931-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07666.x.
8
Dysplasia in short-segment Barrett's esophagus: a prospective 3-year follow-up.短节段巴雷特食管的发育异常:一项为期3年的前瞻性随访研究
Am J Gastroenterol. 1997 Nov;92(11):2012-6.
9
The incidence of adenocarcinoma and dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus: report on the Cleveland Clinic Barrett's Esophagus Registry.巴雷特食管腺癌和发育异常的发病率:克利夫兰诊所巴雷特食管登记处报告
Am J Gastroenterol. 1999 Aug;94(8):2037-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1999.01275.x.
10
Barrett's esophagus: a retrospective analysis of 13 years surveillance.巴雷特食管:13年随访的回顾性分析
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008 Sep;23(9):1362-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2008.05311.x. Epub 2008 Jan 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Texture and Colour Enhancement Imaging versus White Light Endoscopy for Detection of Dysplasia within Barrett's Oesophagus: A Pilot Study.纹理与颜色增强成像对比白光内镜检查用于检测巴雷特食管内发育异常的初步研究
Digestion. 2025 Jun 16:1-9. doi: 10.1159/000546637.
2
Deep Learning Model for Histologic Diagnosis of Dysplastic Barrett's Esophagus: Multisite Cohort External Validation.用于发育异常的巴雷特食管组织学诊断的深度学习模型:多中心队列外部验证
Am J Gastroenterol. 2025 Apr 23. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000003495.
3
Analytical Validation of Esopredict, an Epigenetic Prognostic Assay for Patients with Barrett's Esophagus.
巴雷特食管患者的表观遗传预后检测方法Esopredict的分析验证
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Sep 10;14(18):2003. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14182003.
4
The Aberrant Expression of Biomarkers and Risk Prediction for Neoplastic Changes in Barrett's Esophagus-Dysplasia.生物标志物的异常表达与巴雷特食管发育异常肿瘤性变化的风险预测
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jun 28;16(13):2386. doi: 10.3390/cancers16132386.
5
A simpler diagnostic algorithm of the Japan Esophageal Society classification for Barrett's esophagus-related superficial neoplasia.日本食管学会 Barrett 食管相关黏膜内肿瘤分类的简化诊断算法。
Esophagus. 2024 Jan;21(1):22-30. doi: 10.1007/s10388-023-01029-5. Epub 2023 Dec 8.
6
Molecular Biology and Clinical Management of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.食管腺癌的分子生物学与临床管理
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Nov 14;15(22):5410. doi: 10.3390/cancers15225410.
7
Clinical and Endoscopic Differences Between Patients With Barrett's Esophagus With and Without Dysplasia/Adenocarcinoma.伴有和不伴有发育异常/腺癌的巴雷特食管患者的临床和内镜差异
Cureus. 2023 Oct 1;15(10):e46323. doi: 10.7759/cureus.46323. eCollection 2023 Oct.
8
Unmet needs in Barret's esophagus diagnosis and treatment: a narrative review.巴雷特食管诊断与治疗中未满足的需求:一项叙述性综述
Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Jun 15;8:30. doi: 10.21037/tgh-23-12. eCollection 2023.
9
Endoscopic features of low-grade dysplastic Barrett's.低度异型增生性巴雷特食管的内镜特征
Endosc Int Open. 2023 Aug 7;11(8):E736-E742. doi: 10.1055/a-2102-7726. eCollection 2023 Aug.
10
Quality indicators in Barrett's endoscopy: Best is yet to come.巴雷特食管内镜中的质量指标:最好的尚未到来。
Dig Endosc. 2024 Mar;36(3):265-273. doi: 10.1111/den.14654. Epub 2023 Aug 22.