• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

直流电脉冲诱导与50赫兹起搏对心室颤动和除颤的影响

Induction by direct current pulse versus 50-Hz pacing on ventricular fibrillation and defibrillation.

作者信息

Lim Hoong Sern, Flannigan Sharon, Marshall Howard

机构信息

University Hospital Birmingham NHS Trust, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TH, UK.

出版信息

J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2010 Sep;28(3):209-14. doi: 10.1007/s10840-010-9486-4. Epub 2010 May 12.

DOI:10.1007/s10840-010-9486-4
PMID:20461546
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ventricular fibrillation (VF) induced by different modes of induction may have different characteristics and defibrillation thresholds. This study compares the cycle lengths and defibrillation of VF induced by direct current (DC) pulses vs 50 Hz.

METHOD

We compared induction by DC pulses and 50-Hz pacing in this single-centre observational study of 259 consecutive patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators in 2007-2008. Patients with inadequate defibrillation safety margin (DSM), defined as unsuccessful defibrillation at 25 J, were identified.

RESULTS

Of the 259 patients, 132 underwent induction with DC pulses and 127 with 50-Hz pacing. DC pulses induced VF of shorter cycle lengths (207 ± 16 vs 231 ± 24 ms, p < 0.001) compared to 50-Hz pacing. There were 17 patients (6.6%) with inadequate DSM-13/132 (9.8%) with DC pulse vs 4/127 (3.1%) with 50-Hz pacing (p < 0.001). The induced VF cycle lengths were shorter in patients with inadequate DSM (186 ± 25 vs 221 ± 21 ms, p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, only the induced VF cycle length (p = 0.002) was independently associated with inadequate DSM.

CONCLUSION

VF of shorter cycle lengths is independently associated with inadequate DSM. DC pulses are associated with greater proportion of patients with inadequate DSM as it induces VF of shorter cycle lengths compared to 50-Hz pacing.

摘要

背景

不同诱导方式诱发的心室颤动(VF)可能具有不同的特征和除颤阈值。本研究比较了直流电(DC)脉冲与50Hz诱发的VF的周期长度和除颤情况。

方法

在这项2007 - 2008年对259例连续植入式心脏复律除颤器患者的单中心观察性研究中,我们比较了DC脉冲诱导和50Hz起搏诱导的情况。确定了除颤安全 margin(DSM)不足的患者,定义为在25J时除颤未成功。

结果

259例患者中,132例接受DC脉冲诱导,127例接受50Hz起搏诱导。与50Hz起搏相比,DC脉冲诱发的VF周期长度更短(207±16 vs 231±24ms,p < 0.001)。有17例患者(6.6%)DSM不足 - 13/132例(9.8%)接受DC脉冲诱导,而4/127例(3.1%)接受50Hz起搏诱导(p < 0.001)。DSM不足的患者诱发的VF周期长度更短(186±25 vs 221±21ms,p < 0.001)。多因素分析显示,只有诱发的VF周期长度(p = 0.002)与DSM不足独立相关。

结论

较短周期长度的VF与DSM不足独立相关。与50Hz起搏相比,DC脉冲诱发的VF周期长度更短,因此与DSM不足的患者比例更高相关。

相似文献

1
Induction by direct current pulse versus 50-Hz pacing on ventricular fibrillation and defibrillation.直流电脉冲诱导与50赫兹起搏对心室颤动和除颤的影响
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2010 Sep;28(3):209-14. doi: 10.1007/s10840-010-9486-4. Epub 2010 May 12.
2
Inductionless or limited shock testing is possible in most patients with implantable cardioverter- defibrillators/cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators: results of the multicenter ASSURE Study (Arrhythmia Single Shock Defibrillation Threshold Testing Versus Upper Limit of Vulnerability: Risk Reduction Evaluation With Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantations).大多数植入式心脏复律除颤器/心脏再同步治疗除颤器患者可行无诱导或有限电击测试:多中心ASSURE研究(心律失常单次电击除颤阈值测试与易损性上限:植入式心脏复律除颤器植入的风险降低评估)结果
Circulation. 2007 May 8;115(18):2382-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.663112. Epub 2007 Apr 30.
3
The Effect of Direct Current Stimulation versus T-Wave Shock on Defibrillation Threshold Testing.直流电刺激与T波电击对除颤阈值测试的影响
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2015 Oct;38(10):1173-80. doi: 10.1111/pace.12684. Epub 2015 Jul 26.
4
Predictors of successful defibrillation threshold test during CRT-D implantation.预测 CRT-D 植入期间除颤阈值测试成功的因素。
Kardiol Pol. 2010 May;68(5):512-8.
5
Automated vulnerability testing identifies patients with inadequate defibrillation safety margin.自动化漏洞测试可识别出除颤安全裕度不足的患者。
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2012 Dec;5(6):1073-80. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.112.971275. Epub 2012 Oct 10.
6
Defibrillation threshold testing: is it really necessary at the time of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator insertion?除颤阈值测试:在植入式心律转复除颤器植入时真的有必要吗?
Heart Rhythm. 2005 May;2(5):456-61. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2005.01.015.
7
Shock on T versus direct current voltage for induction of ventricular fibrillation: a randomized prospective comparison.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2004 Jan;27(1):89-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2004.00391.x.
8
The effects of ventricular fibrillation duration and site of initiation on the defibrillation threshold during early ventricular fibrillation.心室颤动持续时间及起始部位对早期心室颤动期间除颤阈值的影响
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998 Aug;32(2):521-7. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(98)00230-7.
9
An observational registry on efficacy and safety of the right ventricular outflow tract as a site for ICD leads: results of the EFFORT (EFFicacy Of Right ventricular outflow Tract as site for ICD leads) registry.一项关于将右心室流出道作为植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)导线植入部位的有效性和安全性的观察性注册研究:EFFORT(右心室流出道作为ICD导线植入部位的有效性)注册研究结果
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2010 Sep;28(3):215-20. doi: 10.1007/s10840-010-9489-1. Epub 2010 Jun 25.
10
Effects of oral propafenone on defibrillation and pacing thresholds in patients receiving implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Propafenone Defibrillation Threshold Investigators.口服普罗帕酮对植入式心脏复律除颤器患者除颤和起搏阈值的影响。普罗帕酮除颤阈值研究组。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996 Aug;28(2):418-22. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(96)00156-8.

引用本文的文献

1
The electrophysiology of electrocution.触电的电生理学
Heart Rhythm O2. 2023 Jun 9;4(7):457-462. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2023.06.004. eCollection 2023 Jul.

本文引用的文献

1
Optimizing defibrillation waveforms for ICDs.优化植入式心律转复除颤器的除颤波形。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2007 Apr;18(3):247-63. doi: 10.1007/s10840-007-9095-z. Epub 2007 Jun 1.
2
A comparison of the output characteristics of several implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.
Heart Rhythm. 2006 Sep;3(9):1053-9. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2006.05.006. Epub 2006 May 5.
3
Elevated defibrillation thresholds in patients undergoing biventricular defibrillator implantation: incidence and predictors.
Heart Rhythm. 2006 Sep;3(9):1010-6. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2006.05.028. Epub 2006 Jun 15.
4
Present understanding of shock polarity for internal defibrillation: the obvious and non-obvious clinical implications.当前对体内除颤时休克极性的理解:明显和不明显的临床意义。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2006 Aug;29(8):885-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2006.00456.x.
5
Effect of amiodarone and sotalol on ventricular defibrillation threshold: the optimal pharmacological therapy in cardioverter defibrillator patients (OPTIC) trial.胺碘酮与索他洛尔对心室除颤阈值的影响:心脏转复除颤器患者的最佳药物治疗(OPTIC)试验
Circulation. 2006 Jul 11;114(2):104-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.618421. Epub 2006 Jul 3.
6
The effect of induction method on defibrillation threshold and ventricular fibrillation cycle length.诱导方法对除颤阈值和心室颤动周期长度的影响。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2006 Apr;17(4):377-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2006.00352.x.
7
Shock on T versus direct current voltage for induction of ventricular fibrillation: a randomized prospective comparison.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2004 Jan;27(1):89-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2004.00391.x.
8
High defibrillation thresholds in transvenous biphasic implantable defibrillators: clinical predictors and prognostic implications.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2003 Jan;26(1 Pt 1):44-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2003.00148.x.
9
Clinical predictors of defibrillation thresholds with an active pectoral pulse generator lead system.带有主动胸壁脉冲发生器导联系统的除颤阈值的临床预测因素。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2002 Apr;25(4 Pt 1):408-13. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2002.00408.x.
10
Is all ventricular fibrillation the same? Influence of mode of induction on characteristics of ventricular fibrillation.所有的心室颤动都一样吗?诱发方式对心室颤动特征的影响。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2000 Dec;11(12):1355-63. doi: 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2000.01355.x.