Department of Chemistry, University of Richmond, Richmond, Virginia 23173, USA.
Account Res. 2010 May;17(3):146-69. doi: 10.1080/08989621003791986.
A survey on authorship issues was conducted with academic chemists in Ph.D.-granting institutions in the United States. Six hundred faculty members responded. The respondents reported a wide range in their attitudes and behavior regarding giving credit in a publication. The various guidelines for authorship are independent of academic background factors such as the relationship between the senior author and the contributor-potential author. However, the survey data reveal significant context-dependency by the respondents. Many respondents would give more credit to their own student than to another professor's student for the exact same contribution to a research project. The survey data further shows that the faculty who received their Ph.D. in the 1940s, 1950s, and 1960s are the most likely to provide authorship, while those who received their Ph.D. in the 1990s and 2000s would most likely give either no credit or acknowledgements.
对美国授予博士学位的机构中的学术化学家进行了一项关于作者身份问题的调查。共有 600 名教师做出了回应。受访者报告了他们在出版物中给予信用方面的态度和行为的广泛差异。各种作者身份指南与学术背景因素无关,例如资深作者和贡献者-潜在作者之间的关系。然而,调查数据显示,受访者的情况存在显著的依赖性。许多受访者会因为对研究项目的相同贡献而给予自己的学生比另一位教授的学生更多的信用。调查数据还表明,那些在 20 世纪 40 年代、50 年代和 60 年代获得博士学位的教师最有可能提供作者身份,而那些在 20 世纪 90 年代和 21 世纪初获得博士学位的教师最有可能不给予信用或致谢。